期刊文献+

语篇的社会认知研究框架——以新闻语篇的言据性分析为例 被引量:9

A Socio-cognitive Discourse Analysis Framework:A Case Study of Evidentiality in News Discourse
原文传递
导出
摘要 社会认知涉及语言符号在社会情境中的主观阐释。为沟通符号和社会,本文提出一个语篇的社会认知研究框架,用于分析处于历史和社会文化情境中的语篇,并通过对比分析《中国日报》和《纽约时报》的两则同题报道的言据性策略证明了此框架的有效性和可行性。分析还表明:记者利用言据性的社会功能,强调某些信息和信息来源,引发受众主观的社会图式和集体记忆,引导受众得出记者期待的社会推论。意识形态影响着记者和新闻机构对新闻的选择、阐释和表达。 Social cognition is concerned with the subjective inter- pretation of linguistic signs in a social context. To bridge the gap between signs and society, this paper attempts to present a socio-cognitive discourse analytic framework for studying the cogni- tive aspects of discourse in a historical and socio-cultural context. The framework is used to contrast the evidential strategies of two news stories with an identical topic, published respective- ly by China Daily and The New York Times. The result of the a- nalysis proves the practicability and validity of the framework, and shows that the journalists employ socio-centric evidentials that emphasize certain information and sources to elicit the tar- get audience's subjective social schemata and collective memo- ry ,leading the latter to generate the social inferences the former has intended. Ideology influences journalists and news agencies in their choice, interpretation,and expression of the news.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期41-45,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 国家社科基金一般项目"类型学视角下的英汉语序比较"(项目编号:11BYY017) 浙江省社会科学联合会课题"汉英新闻语篇言据性类型学研究"(项目编号:2011B104)的阶段性成果
关键词 新闻语篇 言据性 社会图式 社会推论 news discourse evidentiality social schemata social inference
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Bednarek, M. 2006. Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse:A text-driven approach [ J ]. Text & Talk,26 (6) :635 -660.
  • 2Boye, K. 2010. Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguis- tic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemics Mo- dality [ J ]. Linguistic Discovery, 8 ( 1 ) :4 - 22.
  • 3Downing,A.2001. "Surely you knew!" :Surely as a marker of evi- dentiality and stance [ J ]. Functions of Language,8 (2) :253 - 286.
  • 4McCreasy ,E. &N. Ogata. 2007. Evidenfiality ,modality and probabil- ity [ J ]. Linguistics and Philosophy,30 (2) : 147 - 206.
  • 5O' Halloran, K. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition [ M ]. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
  • 6Papafragou, A., P. Li, Y. Choi & C. Han. 2007. Evidentiality in lan- guage and cognition [ J ]. Studies in Language, 103 (2) :253 -299.
  • 7Pishwa, H. 2009. Language and Social Cognition : Expression of the Social Mind[ C ]. New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 8Precht,K. 2003. Stance moods in spoken English:Evidentiality and affect in Britain and American conversation [ J]. Text,23(2) :239 -257.
  • 9Wodak, R. 2006. Mediation between discourse and society: Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA [ J ]. Discourse Studies,8 ( 1 ) :179 - 190.
  • 10M.W.艾森克M.T.基恩.2009.高定国何凌南译.认知心理学(第五版)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.

二级参考文献86

共引文献249

同被引文献131

引证文献9

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部