应用语言学质化研究方法类型:2000-2010 被引量：26

Qualitative Research Approaches in Applied Linguistics:2000-2010

导出

摘要本文以2000-2010年间五种中国外语类核心刊物上发表的应用语言学论文为研究资料,发现在1350篇应用语言学论文中,质化研究89篇,占总数的6%。与20世纪后二十余年的情况相比,尽管质化研究份额仍有限,却呈现上升趋势。对89篇质化研究论文的深入研究显示,这些论文可归纳为八种方法类型:案例研究、语篇分析、内省方法、语料库研究、互动研究、叙事研究、行动研究和人种志。在对上述文章的内容分析基础上,本文探讨质化研究的理论欲求、取样策略、数据分析与呈现,以及质化研究传统的研究思想和研究原则等理论问题。 This paper reports on a survey of applied linguistics ar- ticles published in five major Chinese journals between 2000 and 2010. It was found that 89 qualitative research articles had ap- peared in the journals over this period,taking 6% of the total 1, 350 articles. Compared with the last 20 years of the 20th centu- ry as shown from previous studies, qualitative research, though a minor presence in the field, seems to be on the rise. An in-depth study of the 89 qualitative research articles revealed that they could be categorized into eight qualitative research approaches, i.e. case studies, discourse analysis, introspective methods, cor- pus studies, interactional studies, narrative research, action re- search, and ethnographies. Based on content analyses of the arti- cles, this paper raises and discusses theoretical issues in qualita- tive research including the theoretical drive, sampling strategy, data analysis and presentation, and the assumptions and princi- ples embedded in a qualitative tradition.

作者张培张昕昕韩子钰

机构地区天津财经大学外语系

出处《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期66-69,95,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"中西应用语言学质化研究趋势"(项目编号:10YJA740127) 天津财经大学科研发展基金项目"应用语言学研究方法研究:混合方法的理论与应用"阶段性成果

关键词应用语言学研究方法质化研究 applied linguistics research methods qualitative re- search

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Benson, P. , A. Chik, X. Gao, J. Huang & W. Wang. 2009. Qualita- tive research in language teaching and learning journals [ J ]. The Modern Language Journal,93 (1) :79 -90.
2Bryman, A. 2004. Social Research Methods (2nd edition. ) [ M ]. Ox-ford : Oxford University Press.
3Cohen, L. , L. Manion & K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Edu- cation ( 6th edition. ) [ M ]. London : Routledge.
4Creswell, J. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions [ M ]. Thousand Oaks : SAGE.
5Lazaraton,A. 1995. Qualitative research in applied linguistics:A pro- gress report[ J]. TESOL Quarterly,29(3 ) :455 -472.
6Lazaraton, A. 2002. A Qualitative Approach to the Validation of Oral Language Tests [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
7Lazaraton, A. 2003. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in ap- plied linguistics:whose criteria and whose research? [ J ]. The Modern Language Journal ,87 ( 1 ) : 1 - 12.
8Lazaraton, A. 2005. Quantitative research methods [ A ]. In E. Hinkel ( ed. ). Handbook of Research in Second Language Learning [ C ]. Wahwah : Erlbaum.
9Morse, J. 2010. Procedures and practice of mixed methods design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity [ A ]. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie( eds. ). Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research( 2nd edition. ) [ C ]. Thousand Oaks : Sage.
10Niglas, K. 2010. The multidimensional model of research inethodolo- gy : An integrated set of continua [ A ]. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie ( eds. ). Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research ( 2nd edi- tion. ) [ C ]. Thousand Oaks : Sage.

二级参考文献29

1Brannen, J. Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process [J]. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005, 8(3): 173-184.
2Bryman, J. Social Research Methods.(2^nd ed). [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
3Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. E, Gutmann, M. L. & Hanson, W. E. Advanced mixed methods research designs [A]. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C.(ed). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research [C]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003: 209-240.
4Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V. J. Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice [A]. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C.(ed). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research [C]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003: 91-109.
5Hammersley, M. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism [A]. In Richardson, J. T. E.(ed). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences [C]. Leics: British Psychological Society, 1996: 159-174.
6Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come [J]. Educational Researcher, 2004, 33(7): 14-26.
7Maxcy, S. J. Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism [A]. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C.(ed). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research [C]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003: 51-89.
8Maxwell, J. A. & Loomis, D. M. Mixed methods design: An alternative approach [A]. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C.(ed). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research [C]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003: 241-271.
9Mertens, D. M. Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative- emancipatory perspective [A]. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C.(ed). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research [C]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003: 135-164.
10Morgan, D. L. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to educational research [J]. Oualitative Research. 1998. 3: 362-376.