期刊文献+

另一种认知图式冲突造成的沟通障碍——从新的角度看《奥立安娜》中的人物关系 被引量:1

Another Kind of Conflict in Cognitive Schema:A New Approach to Characterization and Character Relationship in Oleanna
原文传递
导出
摘要 长期以来《奥立安娜》一剧很受批评界的关注,而两个主角间的冲突是批评的焦点。本文在借鉴Schank动态记忆图式理论的基础上,指出了人物之间一种以往被忽略的、复杂的认知图式冲突。从这一新角度切入,可看到女主角话语中的深层连贯性;更重要的是,可以看到该剧人物冲突的根源之一在于认知方式差异,即女主角的"跨域回忆"和独特的"交易"-"教育"图式映射与男主角缺乏自省,甚至虚伪的"人文主义教育"图式应用之间的冲突,构成了该剧的深层矛盾冲突。本文的分析不仅有助于看清该剧人物之间的关系,而且也有助于补充和丰富认知文体学界对认知图式冲突的认识。 For a long time, the female protagonist Carol in Olean- na has attracted much critical attention, and the conflict between the two protagonists in Oleanna has been a hot topic of critical discussion. Drawing on the model of Schank's dynamic memory theory ,this paper directs attention to a neglected kind of compli- cated conflict in cognitive schema between the characters. The a- nalysis from this new angle reveals the underlying coherence in Carol's discourse, and more importantly, brings to light the difference in the two protagonists' "cognition modes" as an im- portant source of their deep conflict,namely, Carol's "cross-do- main reminding" and idiosyncratic mapping from "trade" to "education" schemata and John's unreflective and even hypo- critical exploitation of "humanist education" schema. The analy- sis not only sheds light on the relationship between the protago- nists in the play, but also complements and enriches the under- standing of cognitive schema conflict in cognitive stylistics.
作者 高剑妩 申丹
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期91-95,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 认知图式冲突 《奥立安娜》 认知文体分析 conflict in cognitive schema Oleanna cognitive stylistic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Badenhausen, R. 1998. The modem academy raging in the dark: Mis- reading Mamet' s political incorrectness in Oleanna [J]. College Lit- erature ,25 ( 3 ) : 1 - 19.
  • 2Beers, T. 1987. Schema-theoretic models of reading : Humanizing the machine [ J ]. Reading Research Quarterly,22 (3) :369 - 377.
  • 3Bigsby ,C. 2004. David Mamet[A]. In C. Bigsby ( ed. ). The Cam- bridge Companion to David MametE C]. Cambridge: Cambridge U- niversity Press.
  • 4Burkman ,K. 1998. Misogyny and misanthropy :Anita Hill and David Mamet [ A ]. In A. Hall ( ed. ). Delights, Desires, and Dilemmas [ C ]. Westport: Praeger.
  • 5Cook,G. 1994. Discourse and Literature[M]. New York:Oxford U- niversity Press.
  • 6Goggans, T. 1997. Laying blame: Gender and subtext in David Mamet' s Oleanna [ J ]. Modern Drama ,40 (4) :433 - 441.
  • 7Mamet, D. 1992. Oleanna [ M ]. New York: Vintage.
  • 8Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge [ A ]. In P. Winston ( ed. ). The Psychology of Computer Vision [ C ]. New York :McGraw Hill.
  • 9Murphy, B. 2004. Oleanna : Language and power [ A ]. In C. Bigsby ( ed. ). The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet [ C ]. Cam- bridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Porter,T. 2000. Postmodernism and violence in Mamet' s Oleanna[J]. Modem Drama,43( 1 ) :13 -32.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部