期刊文献+

QS大学排名体系剖析 被引量:25

In-depth Analysis on QS University Rankings System
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从评价对象的选定、指标体系的设置与权重系数的分配、指标观测值的获取、集结模型的构建与数据的处理四个维度,对"QS世界大学排名"、"QS亚洲大学排名"、"QS拉丁美洲大学排名"和"QS世界大学学科排名"进行了全面剖析。高校应当有选择性地根据QS排名方法采取相应的措施,将提升排名、建设世界一流大学和履行大学基本职能有机地结合起来。 The QS World University America, and QS World University Rankings Rankings of the selection of evaluation objects,the , QS University Rankings: Asia, QS University Rankings: Latin by Subject are comprehensively analyzed in this paper in the aspects setting of evaluation indicators system,the distribution of weight coefficients, the collection of indicators' observation values, the construction of aggregate model, and processing of data respectively. Based on QS university ranking methods,Chinese universities should rationally take corresponding measures to organically combine the following elements together: promoting their rankings, building world-class universities, and performing their basic functions.
作者 刘强 丁瑞常
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期44-50,91,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"大学创新力评价研究"(项目批准号06JZD0038)的阶段性研究成果之一
关键词 QS大学排名 指标体系 权重系数 QS university rankings indicators system weight coefficients
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Qs大学排名项目官方网站.http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings.2012-12-20.
  • 2张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量:647
  • 3Martin Inee. (2012). QS Rankings since 2004: Changes to the Global Order. 2012/13 QS World University Rankings Report, 19.
  • 4Andrejs Rauhvargers. (2011 ). Global University Rankings and Their Impact. Belgium, European University Associa- tion, 60.
  • 5Paul Thurman. ( 2012 ). ' Subjective intangibles ': the case for QS reputational surveys. 2012/13 QS World Uni- versity Rankings Report, 16.
  • 6Isidro F. Aguillo and Noelia Guti e rrez Labajos. (2010). Ranking Web of World Universities [ J ]. Journal of Interna- tional Higher Education, 2010, (10) : 153.
  • 7What does Scopus cover? [EB/OL]. http://www.info.sci- verse.com/scopus/scopus-in-detail/facts, 2012-12-29.
  • 8Turner, D. R.(2005 ). Benchmarking in Universities : League Tables Revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 2005, ( 3 ).
  • 9Provan, D. and Avercromby, K.(2000). University League Tables and Rankings:A Critical Analysis. CHEMS Paper, 2000,30.
  • 10Brooks, R.L. (2005). Measuring University Quality. Re- view of Higher Education, 2005, ( 1 ).

二级参考文献31

  • 1方文.群体符号边界如何形成?——以北京基督新教群体为例[J].社会学研究,2005(1):25-59. 被引量:116
  • 2赵志裕,温静,谭俭邦.社会认同的基本心理历程——香港回归中国的研究范例[J].社会学研究,2005(5):202-227. 被引量:210
  • 3Elizabeth F. Farrel, Martin Van Der Weft, Play- ing the Ranking Game, The Chronicle V. 53, Issue 38. A11, 5/25/2005.
  • 4Simon Marginson, Marijk Van Der Wende, To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education, Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 11, No. 3/4, 2007. 306-329.
  • 5Chair's Summary, Informal OECD Ministerial Meeting on Evaluating the Outcomes of Higher Education, Tokyo, 11-12 January 2008, Chaired by Kisaburo Tokai, Minister for Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
  • 6Marguerite Clarke, The Impact of Higher Education Rankings on Student Access, Choice and Opportunity, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007.59-70.
  • 7Gero Federkeil, Some Aspects of Ranking Methodology- The CHE-Ranking of German Universities, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2002.
  • 8Rolan Proulx, Higher Education Ranking and League Tables: Lesson Learned from Benchmarking, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007. 71-82.
  • 9Alex User, Massimo Savino, A Global Survey of University Ranking and League Tables, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007.5-15.
  • 10Johnson D,Terry D,Louis W.Perceptions of the Intergroup Structure and Anti-Asian Prejudice Among White Australians.Group Processes & Intergroup Relation,2005,8(1):53~62

共引文献666

同被引文献223

引证文献25

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部