《宋本杜工部集》版本源流考辨

Analysis on the Origin and Development of the Song of Du Fu's Collected Works

《宋本杜工部集》是后来所刊行的各种杜集的祖本。可是它驳杂异常,是多个版本的合成体。宋仁宗宝元二年(1039),王洙搜集整理编辑成《杜工部集》二十卷,然未见刊行。嘉祐四年(1059),王琪覆刻王洙编定原本十五卷。嘉祐原刻本亦不见存,存者仅为绍兴初翻刻的二王本。南宋初年定型的吴若本,是合校二王本与二王本没有使用过的数种杜集而成的,其阙失部分又由毛扆补钞、张元济补足。嘉祐和绍兴是两个关键时间点,从未全避仁宗讳"禎"字看,其间掺入了嘉祐(即二王本)前后其他行世杜集的成分;从未全避高宗讳"構"字观之,又掺入了绍兴(即吴若本)前后其他杜集的成分,而问题出在毛钞本上。

The Song ofDu Fu＇s Collected Workr by Shanghai Commercial Press printed and published copies was then laid down in the line of ancestors of this variety of it, and was a synthesis of multiple versions of the body. The first arranged and compiled into a collection of Wang Zhu Du Fu＇s Collected Works 20 volumes at Bao Yuan second years （1039）, but not to print., Wang Qi copied Wang Zhu＇s original editions, a total of 15 volumes at Renzong Jia You fourth years （1059）, and now was no longer, survivors only the beginning of Shaoxing, the two Wang of the copied. Wu Ruo＇s editions was case-hardened, in part of the loss filled by Mao Yi and Zhang Yuan-ji However, Ren-Zong Zhao Zhen was never shy about the word see, at least before or after the year ofinter-Po Wang Zhu should be in the spread, but also avoid the Gaozong＇s structure was never the word of view, between Renzong and Gaozong＇s other book in the dissemination of its bottom line was Gaozong Dynasty, and the problem ws in Mao＇s transcript.