期刊文献+

“天人合一”与古代中国的政治生态

"The Integrity of Man and Nature" and the Political Ecology of Ancient China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "天人合一"的思想使天命成为王权合法性的基础,也使民众对政权的认可转变为对统治者与天命之间的关系的认可。并且形成了双重性的认证方式:短期内,通过对话语权的控制来宣称对天命的拥有;长期内,则通过俘获人心来证明不负天命。这种独特的认证方式衍生出古代中国的两大政治法则:结果重于过程和以实力论英雄。这两大法则恶化了古代中国的政治生态。同时,灾异谴告的模式也产生了极大的负面效应。频繁的改朝换代、大规模的战乱、长时间的高压统治成为古代中国的常态。 The thought of integrity between Man and Nature had laid fatality the foundation of the legitimacy of kingship. Meanwhile, it had changed people's recognition of regime into their recognition of the relation between rulers and fatality. Moreover, they had formed an authentication mode of dual nature: in the short term, rulers declared the superiority of fatality through their control over discourse power; in the long run, they wanted to prove that they lived up to the expectation of the fatality through the capture of people" heart. Two political rules were derived from this unique authentication mode, one being that results are more important than process, the other being that the one who possesses the greatest ability is the hero. These two rules had deteriorated the political ecology of ancient China. Meanwhile, the mode of disaster warning had caused extreme negative effects. Thus ancient China was left in the normal state, that is, frequent change of dynasties, large-scale war disasters, and long-time ruling policy of high pressure.
出处 《江南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2013年第1期11-15,共5页 Journal of Jiangnan University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition
关键词 天人合一 合法性 政治生态 灾异谴告 Integrity of Man and Nature Legitimacy Political Ecosystem Theory of Disaster Warning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1余英时.余英时文集:第十卷[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2006:346.
  • 2黄肇基.汉代公羊学灾异理论研究[M].台北:文津出版社有限公司,1998:108-123.
  • 3汉·董仲舒.春秋繁露今注今译[M].赖炎元注译.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1984.
  • 4化涛.论中国古典政治哲学中政权合法性问题[J].晋阳学刊,2008(3):63-66. 被引量:4
  • 5汉·司马迁.史记·陈涉世家[M].北京:中华书局,1959:1950.
  • 6宋·司马光.资治通鉴:卷一七八[M].《文渊阁四库全书·史部·编年类》.
  • 7刘军宁.虚拟访谈:亨廷顿视野中的中国转型[J].南风窗,2009(2):85-87. 被引量:12
  • 8唐·吴兢.贞观政要集校[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984年,第70页.
  • 9殷海光.中国文化的展望·上[M].台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司,1992:134.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[美]丹尼斯·朗.权力论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001..
  • 2余英时.现代儒学的回顾与展望——从明清思想基调的转化看儒学的现代发展[A]..现代儒学论[C].上海:上海人民出版社,1998..
  • 3杨永俊.禅让政治研究[M].北京:学苑出版社,2005.162.
  • 4王爱东.政治权力论[M].保定:河北大学出版社,2003:5-7.
  • 5张康之.评政治学的权力制约思路[J].中国人民大学学报,2000,14(2):66-74. 被引量:53
  • 6彭安玉.论中国古代王权制衡现象及特征[J].湖北行政学院学报,2003(4):85-90. 被引量:2

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部