期刊文献+

顺铂同步放疗在肺癌治疗中的毒性分析和剂量控制 被引量:1

Toxicity analysis and dose control of cisplatin combined with concurrent radiotherapy for lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究不同剂量顺铂同步放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和毒副反应,为顺铂的剂量控制提供一定的依据。方法 63例患者随机分为顺铂高、中、低剂量3组,每组给予注射相应剂量顺铂,同时行常规放疗。观察各组的疗效和毒副反应以及生存质量。结果高、中、低剂量组的总有效率均高于70%,且各相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各剂量组顺铂的毒性反应主要表现为白细胞减少,恶心、呕吐,肾功能损害。且随着顺铂剂量的升高,毒副反应也逐步加大。结论低剂量顺铂同步放疗有较好近期疗效和生存质量,且毒副反应较低,建议临床选用低剂量的顺铂同步放疗对非小细胞肺癌进行治疗。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity effects of cisplatin combined with concurrent radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Furthermore, it also provide a basis for cisplatin dose control. METHODS 63 patients were randomly divided into high, medium and low dose cisplatin groups, each group was given the injection of the appropriate dose cisplatin, while conventional radiotherapy were given. The efficacy, tox- icity and the quality of life were observed in each group. RESULTS The total effective rate were more than 70% in the high, medium and low dose cisplatin groups. The difference was not statistically significant (P 〉 0. 05 ). The main clinical manifestations of toxicity mainly were leukopenia, nausea, vomiting and kidney dysfunction, which increased as the dose of cisplatin rose. CONCLUSION Low-dose cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy showes the better clinical efficacy,lower toxicity, and the patient has a better quality of life. Which can be recommended for clinical use.
作者 郑日葵
出处 《海峡药学》 2013年第2期66-67,共2页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 顺铂 剂量 放疗 非小细胞肺癌 毒性 Cisplatin Dosage Radiotherapy Non-small cell lung cancer Toxicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献91

共引文献92

同被引文献19

  • 1曹子昂.2014第一版NCCN小细胞肺癌治疗指南解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(12):79-81. 被引量:26
  • 2邓可刚.循证医学证据的检索步骤与检索系统的选择[J].中国循证医学杂志,2004,4(9):634-637. 被引量:26
  • 3闫长会,施畅,李玉凤,廖明阳.新铂类药物双环铂与顺铂、卡铂体内毒性的比较研究[J].中国新药杂志,2005,14(10):1156-1159. 被引量:18
  • 4王金全,姚林.顺铂所致的周围神经毒性及其防治措施[J].中国新药杂志,2005,14(10):1236-1239. 被引量:6
  • 5唐棣华. 抗癌药物顺铂抗癌机制的线索. 化学研究与应用, 2010, (1): 96.
  • 6Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. 7thed. Chicago: Spring, Inc, 2009: 103-115.
  • 7Okamoto H, Watanabe K, Kunikane H, et al. Randomised phase Ⅲ trial of carboplatin plus etoposide vs split doses of cisplatin plus etoposide in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: JCGO 9702. Br J Cancer, 2007, 97(2):162-169.
  • 8Guo W, Liao G, Gao H, et al. Randomized comparison of lobaplatin plus etoposide and cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Chinese- German J Clin Oncol, 2013, 12(8): 365-368.
  • 9Karam I, Jiang SY, Khaira M, et al. Outcomes of small cell lung cancer patients treated withcisplatin-etoposide versus carboplatin-etoposide. Am J Clin Oncol, 2013, 38(1): 51-54.
  • 10Sandler AB. Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol, 2003, 30(1): 9- 25.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部