期刊文献+

“安慰剂”概念与传统中医学潜在矛盾之反思 被引量:8

Reflections into the latent contradictions between the "placebo"concept and traditional Chinese medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过分析现代西方医学与传统中医学采取治疗时所依据的主要方式的不同,探讨现代西方医学的疗效研究依据在对应于传统中医学研究时的匹配性,重新分析"安慰剂"概念的真正含义,对其概念在传统中医学研究中所存有的潜在矛盾进行反思。发现两种医学采取治疗时所依据的主要方式存有冲突。现代西方医学的疗效依据在对应于传统中医学研究时缺乏匹配性。"安慰剂"与"安慰剂效应"概念对应于传统中医学时意义有所不同。"安慰剂"概念只是对应一部分现代西方医学实验研究领域,在将其概念对应于传统中医学研究时所得出的结果与结论应当注意加以斟酌。 The correspondence of modern western medicine efficacy research basis and traditional Chinese medi- cine are discussed through analysis of differences in treatment pattern that modern western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine are based on. At the same time, the true meaning of placebo concept is re-analyzed and the la- tent contradiction of this concept when applied to traditional Chinese medicine studies is given in-depth reflection. It turns out that conflicts exist in treatment pattern between the two medicine theories and efficacy research basis of the two medicine theories lack correspondence. The placebo and placebo effect concepts have a different mea- ning when applied to traditional Chinese medicine. The placebo concept is applicable to just a small field of mo- dern western medicine experimental studies. The research results and conclusions drawn from traditional Chinese medicine studies based on this concept should be given the necessary discretion and criticism.
作者 林香均 李瑞
出处 《中国针灸》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期269-272,共4页 Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词 安慰剂 现代西方医学 传统中医学 方法学 placebo modern western medicine traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Schonauer K. Semiotic Foundation of Drug Therapy: The Placebo Problem in a New Perspective[M]. Ber- lin, New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 1994 : 235-- 240.
  • 2Kaptchuk T J. Intentional ignorance: A history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine[J]. Bull Hist Med,1998,72(3) :389--433.
  • 3Jadad A R, Moore R A, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996,17 (1) :1-12.
  • 4Kaptchuk T J. Powerful placebo: The dark side of the randomised controlled trial [J ]. Lancet, 1998, 351 (9117) : 1722-- 1725.
  • 5Collingwood R G. An Essay on Metaphysics [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998 : 156-- 170.
  • 6Walach H. The efficacy paradox in randomized con- trolled trials of CAM and elsewhere: beware of the placebo trap [J]. J Altern Complement Med, 2001,7(3):213--218.
  • 7Ezzo J, Lao L, Berman B M. Clinical Acupuncture: Scientific Basis [M]. New York: Springer, 2001:113 --130.
  • 8Seeger D. Physiotherapy in low back pain--indications and limits [J]. Schmerz,2001,15(6) :461--467.
  • 9Kirsch I. The Placebo Effect: Interdisciplinary Explo- rations [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997 : 166-- 186.
  • 10Kirsch I, Sapirstein G. Expectancy, Experience, and Behavior[M]. Washington DC: American Psycholo- gical Association, 1999 : 303- 320.

共引文献8

同被引文献88

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部