期刊文献+

分子分型对1~3个腋窝淋巴结转移早期乳腺癌患者局部或区域复发风险的预测价值 被引量:8

Predictive value of molecular subtyping for loco-regional recurrence in early breast cancer patientswith one to three positive axillary lymph nodes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究1~3个腋窝淋巴结转移早期(病理N1期)乳腺癌分子分型与术后局部或区域复发(LR)间关系,探讨改进个体化辅助放疗指征。方法回顾分析1998—2009年本院手术的547例病理T1~2N1M0期乳腺癌根治术后未行放疗患者。根据免疫组织化学、荧光原位杂交检测结果分为LuminalA、LuminalB、HER-2过表达和三阴型,比较LR复发率(LRR)及LR生存率(LRFS),并结合临床病理特征对其LR风险进行分组分析。Kaplan-Meier法计算LRR、LRFS并Logrank法检验和单因素预后分析,多因素预后分析采用Cox模型。结果LuminalA、LuminalB、HER-2过表达和三阴型分别占30.0%、48.6%、9.3%和12.1%。随访率97.1%,随访时间满5、10年者分别为334、127例。单因素分析显示HER-2过表达型、三阴型LR风险比LuminalA型高,5年LRR分别为19.0%、14.9%与5.3%(X2=4.28、5.02,P:0.026、0.015),LRFS分别为73.5%、80.6%与91.1%(X2=7.27、4.77,P=0.005、0.021)。多因素分析显示HER-2过表达型、三阴型、年龄≤35岁、pT:期病变是LRR及LRFS的不良预后因素(X2=2.29、2.08、18.22、6.86,P=0.020、0.016、0.001、0.005及X2=1.90、1.41、8.58、3.94,P=0.006、0.025、0.002、0.039)。有以上0、1和i〉2个危险因素者10年LRR分别为4.3%、14.1%和31.9%(X2=28.03,P=0.000)。结论分子分型有助于个体化区别1~3个腋窝淋巴结转移病理N.早期乳腺癌患者间LR风险,具有多个危险因素者应接受术后放疗。 Objective To investigate the relationship between molecular subtypes of breast cancer and postoperative loco-regional recurrence (LR) in early breast cancer patients with 1--3 positive axillary lymph nodes ( pN1 ) and to improve the individualized indications for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in these patients. Methods A total of 547 patients with pT1-2 N1M0 breast cancer, who received masteetomy between December 1998 and December 2009 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, were retrospectively analyzed. None of them received adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy. The patients were divided into luminal A group, luminal B group, HER-2-overexpressing group, and triple-negative group according to the molecular subtypes of breast cancer determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The patients in different groups were compared in terms of LR rate (LRR) and LR-free survival (LRFS) , and the risk factors for LR were analyzed in combination with clinical and pathological features. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to calculate LRR and LRFS;the Logrank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate prognostic analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results The luminal A group, luminal B group, HER-2-overexpressinggroup, and triple-negative group accounted for 30. 0% , 48.6%, 9. 3% , and 12. 1% , respectively, of all the patients. The follow-up rate was 97. 1% ;334 patients were followed up for at least 5 years, and 127 were followed up for at least 10 years. Univariate analysis showed that, compared with the luminal A group, the HER-2-overexpressing group and triple-negative group had significantly higher 5-year LRRs (19. 0% vs 5.3% , X2 = 4. 28, P = 0. 026 ; 14. 9% vs 5.3% , X2=5.02, P = 0. 015) and significantly lower LRFSs (73.5% vs 91.1%, X2=7.27, P=0.005;80.6% vs 91.1%,X2=4.77, P=0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that HER-2 overexpression, triple-negative phenotype, age of ≤ 35 years, and stage pT2 were poor prognostic factors for survival ( LRR and LRFS) ( X2 = 2. 29, 2. 08, 18.22, and 6. 86, P = 0. 020, 0. 016, 0. 001, and 0. 005;X2 = 1.90, 1.41, 8.58, and 3.94, P = 0. 006, 0. 025, 0. 002, and 0. 039). The 10-year LRRs of patients with 0, 1, and ≥2 of the above risk factors were 4. 3% , 14. 1% , and 31.9%, respectively ( X2= 28.03, P = 0. 000 ). Conclusions Molecular subtyping is helpful for individualized evaluation of LR risk in early breast cancer patients with 1--3 positive axillary lymph nodes (oN,). PMRT should be recommended for the patients with 2 or more risk factors for LR.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期89-93,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 广东省科技计划项目(20128031800117)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 分子分型 免疫组织化学 荧光原位杂交 乳腺肿瘤 放射疗法 预后 Breast neoplasms, molecular subtyping Immunohistochemistry Fluorescence in situ hybridization Breast neoplasms/radiotherapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Olivotto IA, Truong PT, Chua B. Postmastectomy radiation therapy:who needs it? J Clin Onco1,2004 ,22 :4237-4239.
  • 2惠周光,余子豪.我国乳腺癌改良根治术后放疗现状的调查分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(6):471-475. 被引量:41
  • 3Buchholz TA, Woodward WA, Duan Z, et al. Radiation use and long-term survival in breast cancer patients with Tj, T2 primary tumors and one to three positive axillary lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2008,71 : 1022-1027.
  • 4Park YH, Lee SJ, Cho EY, et al. Clinical relevance of TNM staging system according to breast cancer subtypes. Ann Oncol, 2011.22 1554-1560.
  • 5<乳腺癌HER2检测指南>编写组,霍临明.乳腺癌HER2检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):631-633. 被引量:164
  • 6Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina breast cancer study. JAMA, 2006,295 : 2492 -2502.
  • 7王淑莲,李晔雄,宋永文,王维虎,金晶,刘跃平,刘新帆,余子豪.激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体2的表达与改良根治术后淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者预后的关系[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(7):520-525. 被引量:7
  • 8National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer (version 3. 2012) [ EB/OL]. Fort Washington : NCCN, 2012 [ 2012-09-10 ]. http :// www. nccn. org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines, asp.
  • 9Albert JM, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Guray M, et al. Estrogen/ progesterone receptor negativity and HER-2 positivity predict locoregional recurrence in patients with Tta' bN0 breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2010,77:1296-1302.
  • 10Zhang Y, Ma QY, Dang CX, et al. Quantitative molecular diagnosis of axillary drainage fluid for prediction of locoregional failure in patients with one to three positive axillary nodes after mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,64 : 505-511.

二级参考文献103

  • 1惠周光,余子豪.我国乳腺癌改良根治术后放疗现状的调查分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(6):471-475. 被引量:41
  • 2周卫兵,冯炎,陈佳艺,邵志敏.术后放疗在伴有腋窝淋巴结1~3个转移的T1~T2期乳腺癌中的作用[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(5):396-400. 被引量:12
  • 3Truong PT, Olivotto IA, Kader HA, et al. Selecting breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors and one to three positive axillary nodes at high postmastectomy locoregional recurrence risk for adjuvant radiotherapy [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005,61(5) : 1337-1347.
  • 4Truong PT, Woodward WA, Thames HD, et al. The ratio of positive to excised nodes identifies high-risk subsets and reduces inter-institutional differences in locoregional recurrence risk estimates in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive nodes: an analysis of prospective data from British Columbia and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007,68 ( 1 ) : 59-65.
  • 5Saphner T, Tormey DC, Gray R. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1996,14(10) : 2738-2746.
  • 6Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Robertson C, et al. Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation [J]. Ann Oncol, 2002,13 (2):273- 279.
  • 7Wallgren A, Bonetti M, Gelber RD, et al. Risk factors for locoregional recurrence among breast cancer patients: results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I through VII [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003,21(7):1205-1213.
  • 8Oh JL, Bonnen M, Outlaw ED, et al. The impact of young age on locoregional recurrence after doxorubicin-based breast conservation therapy in patients 40 years old or younger: How young is "young"? [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 65(5) : 1345-1352.
  • 9van der Hage JA, Putter H, Bonnema J, et al. EORTC Breast Cancer Group. Impact of locoregional treatment on the early- stage breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2003,39(15) : 2192-2199.
  • 10Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Nielsen HM, Overgaard M, Grau C, et al. Study of failure pattern among high-risk breast cancer patients with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy in addition to adjuvant systemic therapy: long- term results from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82 b and c randomized studies [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24( 15 ) : 2268-2275.

共引文献226

同被引文献68

  • 1周卫兵,冯炎,陈佳艺,邵志敏.术后放疗在伴有腋窝淋巴结1~3个转移的T1~T2期乳腺癌中的作用[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(5):396-400. 被引量:12
  • 2<乳腺癌HER2检测指南>编写组,霍临明.乳腺癌HER2检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):631-633. 被引量:164
  • 3李连弟,鲁凤珠,张思维,牧人,孙秀娣,皇甫小梅,孙杰,周有尚,欧阳宁慧,饶克勤,陈育德,孙爱明,薛志福,夏毅.中国恶性肿瘤死亡率20年变化趋势和近期预测分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1997,19(1):3-9. 被引量:869
  • 4Clarke DH, Martinez AA. Identification of patients who are at high risk for locoregional breast cancer recurrence after consetwative sur- gery and radiotherapy: a review article for surgeons, pathologists, and radiation and medical oncologists [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1992, 10 (3): 474-483.
  • 5Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, et al. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse [J], J Clin Oncol, 2010,28: 1684-1691.
  • 6Wo JY, Taghian AG, Nguyen PL, et al. The association between bi- ological subtype and isolated regional nodal failure after breast conserving therapy [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 77: 188-196.
  • 7National comprehensive cancer network, Inc, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in ontology: breast cancer (version 3. 2012) [EB/OL]. For Washington: NCCN, 2012[2012-09-10]. http://www. nccn. org/professional/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.
  • 8PEROU CM, SORLIE T, EISEN MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6797): 747-752.
  • 9SORLIE T, PEROU CM, TIBSHIRANI R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(19): 10869-10874.
  • 10IHEMELANDU CU, LEFFALL LD, DEWITYY RL, et al. Molec- ular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women:age-specific prevalence and survival[J]. J Surg Res, 2007, 143(1): 109-118.

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部