期刊文献+

国际投资条约中的“利益拒绝”条款研究 被引量:2

A Study on the Denial of Benefits Clause in International Investment Treaties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际投资条约中的"利益拒绝"条款的目的在于确保投资条约不被第三国投资者控制的所谓"邮箱公司"所利用。近年来该条款成为国际投资仲裁中争议较大的条款之一。该条款的适用条件具有模糊性,而其到底针对管辖权问题还是实体问题、如何具体实施该条款以及该条款的实施是否具有溯及力都具有较大的争议。对于这些争议,一方面由于不同条约的具体表述不同,因此仍需要进行个案分析,另一方面,由于相关案例尚不十分丰富,因此某些仲裁庭也不能给出十分准确解释。因此,对于该条款的研究有助于日后相关条约的立法,也有利于仲裁员正确理解该条款。 The purpose of the denial of benefits clause in international investment treaty is to preclude the abusive use of the treaty by a mailbox company controlled by a third party's investor. This clause has been a quite controversial one in international investment cases in recent years. Its applicable conditions are ambiguous. And there is also a controversy over the jurisdiction or merits, the exercise of the clause and its retrospective effect. These controversies, on the one hand, need to be analyzed case by case due to the different texts of different treaties; on the other hand, some arbitration tribunals cannot give accurate in- terpretations because of the inadequate quantity of relevant cases. Therefore, the study on this clause is helpful to the future legislation on relevant treaties and to the arbitrators" correct interpretation of it.
作者 马迅
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第1期99-104,共6页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究"<能源宪章条约>与国际投资法的发展--兼论我国的应对策略"(09YJC820130)的研究成果之一
关键词 国际投资条约 利益拒绝条款 邮箱公司 能源宪章条约 international investment treaty denial of benefits clause mailbox company ECT
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Loukas A. Mistelis & Crina Mihaela Baltag, Denial of Benefits and Article 17 of the Energy Charter Treaty, Penn State Law Review, Vol. 113:4, p. 1302.
  • 2Herman Walker Jr. , Provisions on Companies in United States Commercial Treaties, 50 AM. J. INT'L L. 373, 388 (1956).
  • 3余劲松,吴志攀.国际经济法[M].北京:北京大学出版社;高等教育出版社,2009.
  • 4Richard Happ & Ulrich Klemm, Considerations of denial of ben- efit clauses and other mechanisms that limit the scope of BIT for investors, in The Determination of the Nationality of Investors under Investment Protection Treaties: A Preliminary Report, by ILA German Branch Working Group, p. 57, available at ht- tp://telc, jura. uni-halle, de/sites/default/files/BeitraegeTWR/ Heft%20106. Ddf.
  • 5陈延忠.国内反避税法与税收协定相容性问题分析[J].国际经济法学刊,2007(2):280-300. 被引量:1
  • 6H. Essig, Balancing Investors' Interests and State Sovereignty: The ICSID Decision on Jurisdiction Plama Consortium Ltd. v. Republic of Bulgaria, 5 Oil, Gas & Energy L. Intelligence, A- pril 2007, 10.
  • 7Stephen Jagusch & Anthony Sinclair, The Limits of Protection for Investments and Investors Under the Energy Charter Trea- ty, in Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty, edited by Clarisse Ribeiro, Juris Publishing Inc. , June 2006, p. 73.
  • 8James Chalker, Making the Energy Charter Treaty Too Investor Friendly: Plama Consortium Limited v. The Republic of Bul- garia, (2006) 3 Transnational Dispute Management (TDM) 1, pp. 16-19.
  • 9Stephen Jagusch b- Anthony Sinclair, The Limits of Protection for Investments and Investors Under the Energy Charter Trea- ty, in Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty, edited by Clarisse Ribeiro, Juris Publishing Inc. , June 2006, p. 101.
  • 10Laurence Shore, The Jurisdiction Problem in Energy Charter Treaty Claims, IALR 2007, 58(64).

同被引文献29

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部