期刊文献+

构式语法视角下的回溯语研究

A Study on Retronym from the Perspective of Construction Grammar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回溯语(retronym)指的是"用新称呼来指代旧概念"的语言现象。通过对其组构类型的重新分类,以及从"构式"的角度对其形式、意义和语用层面上作全局的解释发现:回溯语"定+中"的层级性结构属于构式上的"自主-依存"关系,回溯语"定+中"修饰语的选择机制属于构式上的"部分-整体"关系,回溯语"定+中"这一语符的使用乃是基于构式上的"语义-句法映射"关系而来。 Retronym is a linguistic phenomenon of using a new name to replace a certain traditional concept while new con- cepts appear. This paper deals with its new classification in construction types and global interpretation separately in its formal, se- mantic and pragmatic structures viewed from symbolic unit and construction. The findings are: firstly, the hierarchical structure of retronymic expression "modifier plus central word" belongs to Autonomy-Dependence Relation; secondly, the selection mechanism of retronymic modifier belongs to Part-Whole Relation; finally, the use of retronymic modifier is based on the Semantic-Syntax Mapping Relation.
作者 鲍晓伟
出处 《安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第1期75-79,共5页 Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
关键词 回溯语 构式 自主 依存 部分 整体 语义 句法 retronym construction Autonomy-Dependence Part-Whole Semantic-Syntax
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1张建理,邵斌.从回溯语看当代语言的演进[J].外语教学与研究,2010,42(3):184-189. 被引量:6
  • 2邵斌.漫画英语时尚新词[M].大连理工大学出版,2006:185-187.
  • 3邵斌.透过新词看文化[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008.
  • 4黄兴国.模因论视角下的回溯语及其语用成因探析[J].安顺学院学报,2011,13(3):33-35. 被引量:1
  • 5王寅.构式语法研究(上)[M].上海外语教育出版社,2011.
  • 6Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O' Connor. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Con- structions : The Case of Let Alone. Language 64 ( 3 ) , 1988 : 501.
  • 7王寅.认知语法概论[M].上海外语教育出版社,2006.2.
  • 8Langacker, R. W. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduc- tion. New York ; Oxford University Press,2008:66.
  • 9Langacker,R.W.TenLecturesOilCognitiveGrammarbyRonaldLangacker.北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2007:128.
  • 10KOCH P. Frame and contiguity. On the Cognitive Basis of Metanymy and Certain Types of Word Formation [ C]//Me- tonymy in Language and Thought. Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1999 : 139 - 167.

二级参考文献22

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量:730
  • 2何自然.语言中的模因[J].语言科学,2005,4(6):54-64. 被引量:1824
  • 3赵霞.作格结构及其概念框架分析[J].外语与外语教学,2006(6):10-13. 被引量:11
  • 4[1]MINSKY M·A.Framework for Representing Knowledge[C]∥WINSTON P· H.The Psychology of Computer Vision.New York:McGraw Hill,1975:211-277.
  • 5[2]FILLMORE C.Frame Semantics[C]∥Linguistics in the Morning Calm.Seoul:Hanshin Publishing Co.,1982:111-137.
  • 6[4]CROFT W,CRUSE D·A.Cognitive Linguistics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004:87-103.
  • 7[5]COULSON S.Semantic Leaps:Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001:101.
  • 8[6]HAIMAN J.The iconicity of grammar:Isomorphism and Motivation[J].Language,1980(56):515-540.
  • 9[8]KOCH P.Frame and Contiguity.On the Cognitive Basis of Metonymy and Certain Types of Word Formation[C]∥Metonymy in Language and Thought.Philadelphia:John Benjamins,1999:139-167.
  • 10[9]DIRVEN R,VERSPOOR M.Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics[C].Philadelphia:John Benjamins Pub.Co.1998:112-147.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部