期刊文献+

基于模糊层次分析法的产品可用性评价方法 被引量:81

Product Usability Evaluation Method Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高产品设计的可用性水平,将用户的主观感受作为可用性的重要评价指标,把可用性分为外观可用性、感知可用性和绩效可用性,提出基于模糊层次分析法的产品可用性评价方法,并以手机为例进行研究。构建可用性评价的指标体系,选择6款有代表性的手机作为试验样本,邀请36名被试,采用被试间试验设计的方法测试样本的可用性,依据测试结果计算隶属度,由隶属度分析样本存在的可用性问题。建立可用性最优的模糊层次分析模型,根据隶属度确定模糊评判矩阵,并设定外观可用性、感知可用性以及绩效可用性之间的权重。求解样本的可用性分数,对其进行去模糊化处理,并以平均值和标准差对样本的可用性进行排序和评价。研究结果表明该方法能有效地发现产品存在的可用性问题,并能对可用性进行定量评价。 In order to improve the usability level of product design, user's subjective experience is taken as an important evaluation index of usability, and usability is divided into apparent usability, perceived usability, and performing usability. Product usability evaluation method based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is proposed, and the mobile phones are used as a case study. Evaluation index system is established. Six representative mobile phones are selected as experimental samples, and 36 subjects are invited to participate. A between-subjects experimental design method is adopted to test the usability of the samples. According to the test results, the membership degrees are computed, which can be used to analyze the problems existing in the experimental samples. The FAHP model of optimum usability is constructed. Fuzzy evaluation matrix is built via membership degrees, and the weights among apparent usability, perceived usability, and performing usability are set. The scores of samples are calculated and defuzzified, and the samples' usability is evaluated and ranked through mean and standard deviation. The results suggest that using the presented method, the problems of product usability can be found effectively, and product usability can be evaluated quantitatively.
出处 《机械工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第14期183-191,共9页 Journal of Mechanical Engineering
基金 江苏省高校自然科学研究资助项目(10KJD460002)
关键词 产品设计 可用性 评价方法 模糊层次分析法 Product design Usability Evaluation method Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1MACK Z, SHARPLES S. The importance of usability in product choice: A mobile phone case study[J]. Ergonomics, 2009, 52(12): 1514-1528.
  • 2NIELSEN J. Usability engineering[M]. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
  • 3HAN S H, KIM J. A comparison of screening methods: Selecting important design variables for modeling product usability[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2003, 32(3): 189-198.
  • 4HERTZUM M, CLEMMENSEN T. How do usability professionals construe usability?[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2012, 70(1): 26-42.
  • 5SEVA R R, GOSIACO K G T, SANTOS M C E D, et al. Product design enhancement using apparent usability and affective quality[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2011, 42(3): 511-517.
  • 6SONDEREGGER A, SAUER J. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2010, 41(3): 403-410.
  • 7ZHENG X, LIN J, ZAPF S, et al. Visualizing user experience through perceptual maps concurrent assessment of perceived usability and subjective appearance in car infotairtment systems[J]. Digital Human Modeling, 2007, 4561. 536-545.
  • 8NANTEL J, GLASER E. The impact of language and culture on perceived website usability[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2008, 25(1-2): 112-122.
  • 9FENKO A, SCHIFFERSTEIN H N J, HEKKERT P. Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2010, 41(1): 34-40.
  • 10VERGARA M, MONDRAGON S, SANCHO-BRU J L, et al. Perception of products by progressive multisensory integration. A study on hammers[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2011, 42(5): 652-664.

二级参考文献39

共引文献271

同被引文献786

引证文献81

二级引证文献507

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部