摘要
对比活性炭吸附和乙酸丁酯萃取两种金矿样的测试方法,前者设备少、毒性小,但分析结果误差稍大;后者萃取成本较高,但分析误差较小。
In this paper, we have a comparison between 2 methods, ie, active carbon adsorption and butyl acetate abstract ion method. The former one is characterized by equipment fewer and poison less, but error slightly heavier than those of the-latter. The cost of the latter is higher, but the analysis error is slighter.
出处
《云南地质》
2012年第4期516-517,共2页
Yunnan Geology
关键词
二种金分析测试
干法火试金法
湿法酸分解法
各有优缺点
对比研究
2 Methods of Au Testing
Dry Method - ignition Testing
Wet Method - Acid Resolution
Not Perfect for Every One
Comparison Study
