期刊文献+

中美大学生理想伴侣相对偏好的性别与文化比较 被引量:3

Sino-American College Students' Relative Preferences for Ideal Partners
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亲密关系是社会心理学的重要研究领域,而理想伴侣一直是亲密关系领域的重要研究对象之一。已有研究大多考察人们的理想伴侣绝对偏好,较少涉猎理想伴侣相对偏好问题。本研究通过对664名中美大学生的问卷调查,比较了中美被试在外在特征、兴趣爱好、价值观等方面的理想伴侣相对偏好,以及相应的性别差异和文化差异特征。结果发现:(1)在兴趣爱好、价值观的理想伴侣相对偏好上,中美被试表现出较大相似性;(2)在外在特征、兴趣爱好、价值观的理想伴侣相对偏好上,女性的相对偏好更严苛;(3)与中国被试相比,美国被试的理想伴侣相对偏好性别差异更小。以上结果表明,进化心理和文化演进在不同程度上同时形塑人们的择偶心理。 Research on ideal partner in intimate relationship is of significance in social psychology. Previous studies in this line concentrated mainly on absolute preferences difference between the male and female or across cul- tures. An investigation was initiated for 664 Sino-Amer- ican college students to explore relative preferences for ideal partners in physical traits, interests and hobbies, and values. The results showed that: (1)there share many similarities between Chinese and American's rel- ative preferences for ideal partners. However, the female subjects' appeal for ideal partners is stricter than the male, which supports the evolutionary psychological hy- pothesis; (2)Difference of relative preferences for ideal partners between American men and women is less evi- dent than Chinese. Taken together, the evolutionary psy- chological mechanism and the cultural influences could shape the psychology of spouse selection of the mankind to a larger or smaller extent concurrently.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2012年第3期195-203,共9页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 南开大学2008年度人文社会科学校内青年项目(NKQ08034)资助
关键词 理想伴侣 相对偏好 价值观 进化心理 ideal partner, relative preference, value, evolutionary psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1乐国安,陈浩,张彦彦.进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验——以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):561-568. 被引量:52
  • 2Amy, L. D. (2005) . Gender, Gender Role Adhererwe, and Self-Esteem in Long Term Mate Selection Prefer- erwes among College Student. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ohio University.
  • 3Bouchard,T. J. , & McGue, M. ( 1981 ). Familial stud- ies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055 - 1059.
  • 4Buss, D. M. ( 1987). Evolutionary hypotheses and be- havioral genetic methods: Hopes for a union of two disparate disciplines. Behavioral artcl Brain Science, 10,20 - 21.
  • 5Buss, D. M. ( 1995 ). Psychological sex differences: Ori- gins though sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50,164 - 168.
  • 6Buss, D. M. , & Barnes, M. ( 1986). Preferences in hu- man mate selection. Journal of Personality and So- cial Psychology, 50,559 - 570.
  • 7Buss, D. M. , Shackefford, T. K. , Kirkpatrick, L. A. , & '[arsen,R.J. (2001). A half-century of mate prefer- ences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63,491 - 503.
  • 8De Raad, B. , & Doddema-Winsemius, M. ( 1992). Fac- tors in the assortment of human mates: Differential preferences in Germany and the Netherlands. Per- sonality and Individual Differerwes, 13,103 - 114.
  • 9Eagly, A. H. (1987) . Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 10Eagly,A. H. , & Wood, W. ( 1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54 ,408- 423.

二级参考文献2

共引文献51

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部