期刊文献+

钱澄之《田间诗学·古序考》论析

On Qian Chengzhi's The Examination of The Introduction to Pastoral Poetics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宋代学界,疑古精神大兴,对《诗经》的解读也兴起一股废《序》言《诗》的潮流。清初钱澄之撰《田间诗学》,在该书《古序考》一文中综合前贤之论,主张要依《序》解《诗》。概括钱氏《诗》学观关于《小序》的论点有二条:一是《小序》不可废,首句可信而申续之文有待商榷;二是《小序》首句为采诗太师所题,申续之文为东汉卫宏续作。 There was a scepticism in academia in Song dynasty and many scholars were ready to research Shijing without Introduction. The Examination of The Intraduction to Pastoral Poebics by Qianchengzhi in early stage of Qing dynasty advocaded to research Shijing according to Xiaoxu . There were two views: Firstly scholars must research Shijing according to Xiaoxu . The first sentence was dependable, and other sentences were not sure. Secondly Taishi collecting poems composed the first sentence and Wei Hong in East Han Dynasty dynansty composed the other sentences.
作者 周挺启
出处 《商丘师范学院学报》 CAS 2012年第4期79-82,共4页 Journal of Shangqiu Normal University
关键词 《小序》 朱熹 《田间诗学》 钱澄之 The Introduction Zhu Xi Pastoral Poetics Qian Chengzhi
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1宋·朱熹.朱子全书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社;合肥:安徽教育出版社,2002:522.
  • 2清·阮元.十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980.919.
  • 3清·钱澄之.田间诗学·序[M].朱一清,校点.合肥,黄山书社,2005.
  • 4汉·班固.汉书[M].唐·颜师古,注.北京,中华书局,1975.
  • 5清·永路,等.四库全书总目[M].北京,中华书局,1965.
  • 6[宋]范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
  • 7三国·陆玑.三百篇草木鸟兽虫鱼疏[M]∥四库全书.上海,上海古籍出版社,1987.
  • 8唐·魏征,令狐德棻.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973..
  • 9晋·陈寿.三国志·魏书[M].宋·裴松之,注.北京,中华书局,1959.
  • 10宋·苏辙.诗集传[M]∥四库全书.上海,上海古籍出版社,1987.

共引文献279

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部