摘要
宋代学界,疑古精神大兴,对《诗经》的解读也兴起一股废《序》言《诗》的潮流。清初钱澄之撰《田间诗学》,在该书《古序考》一文中综合前贤之论,主张要依《序》解《诗》。概括钱氏《诗》学观关于《小序》的论点有二条:一是《小序》不可废,首句可信而申续之文有待商榷;二是《小序》首句为采诗太师所题,申续之文为东汉卫宏续作。
There was a scepticism in academia in Song dynasty and many scholars were ready to research Shijing without Introduction. The Examination of The Intraduction to Pastoral Poebics by Qianchengzhi in early stage of Qing dynasty advocaded to research Shijing according to Xiaoxu . There were two views: Firstly scholars must research Shijing according to Xiaoxu . The first sentence was dependable, and other sentences were not sure. Secondly Taishi collecting poems composed the first sentence and Wei Hong in East Han Dynasty dynansty composed the other sentences.
出处
《商丘师范学院学报》
CAS
2012年第4期79-82,共4页
Journal of Shangqiu Normal University
关键词
《小序》
朱熹
《田间诗学》
钱澄之
The Introduction
Zhu Xi
Pastoral Poetics
Qian Chengzhi