社区老人健康体检血清六项检测结果分析

Community Elderly People Health Examination Serum six Detection Result Analysis

目的:对某社区65岁及以上老人健康体检的血清六项检测结果资料进行回顾性统计分析,为社区老年保健提供依据。方法:对725位老人4320项次中的异常结果(高于正常值上限或低于正常值下限)计算异常率、异常项次百分比排序和性别差异比较及异常率与年龄的相关分析。结果:男女异常率排序前三项相同依次为TG、GLU和BUN;第四位男性为DBIL而女性为CHOL;第五位男性为CHOL而女性为DBIL;第六位男女均为ALT。其异常率性别差异是CHOL女高于男,P<0.05,BUN男高于女,P<0.05,其余四项及总异常项次比,均未发现性别差异P>0.05。各年龄组段异常项次比均无性别差异,异常项次比与年龄之间未发现相关关系。结论:除CHOL和BUN异常率有性别差异外其余均无性别差异,且异常项次比与年龄无相关关系。

Objective：retrospective analysis into serum six detection results of elderly people over 65 years old in a community to serve as the basis for medicare of the elderly people. Method：As to the 4320 items of 725 elderly per- sons, abnormal rate, abnormal item percentage ranking, comparison of sexual differences, correlation analysis of age and abnormal rate have been calculated and made. Result：Top three of abnormal rates among male and female is TG, GLU, and BUN respectively, No.4 is DBIL for male and CHOL for female, No. 5 is CHOL for male and DBIL for fe- male, No. 6 is ALT for both men and women. Sexual differences are that female is higher than male in CHOL, P〈0.05; male is higher than female in BUN, P〈0.05, other four items and total abnormal rate show no significance sexual dif- ferences P〉0.05. abnormal item percentage ranking shows no difference in sexs in all age groups, no correlation has been found between abnormal item percentage ranking and ages. Conclusion ：There are no sexual differences except CHOL and BUN, and no correlation between abnormal item percentage ranking and ages.