中·日和韩·日岛屿争端的比较研究及对我国的启示

A Comparative Study on Island's Disputes between China-Japan vs.Korea-Japan and the Enlightenment for China

中国在中日钓鱼岛争端中一贯主张"搁置争议、共同开发"的和平解决方针,但日本不仅不接受,反而肆意控制中国固有主权的领土,藐视国际司法秩序。钓鱼岛和独岛争端的比较研究,揭露了日本国对领土争端中采取的矛盾立场,以及日本国领土主张之缺陷。树立"以其矛,克其盾"的战略,联合韩国等相关利益国家,通过国际法院解决钓鱼岛争端是中国解决钓鱼岛争端的首选途径。

China has a consistent position of ＂shelve disputes, common development＂ on Diaoyu islands dispute between China and Japan, and insists peaceful resolution. But Japan does not only accept it, but also expands its control to Chinese inherent sovereign territory, despising international judicial order. The comparative study between Diaoyu islands and Dokdo islands exposes the contradiction of Japan in the territorial dispute, as well as the defects of claim in the territorial arguments. It is the preferred way to solve the Diaoyu islands dispute through the international court by jointing with South Korea and other interest- related countries.