期刊文献+

基于动态测量数据损伤定位识别的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Identifying Structural Damage Location Based on Dynamic Measurement Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 动态测量数据经模态分析可得到结构动态参数,通过结构动态参数的变化能识别土木工程结构中的损伤。利用模态柔度、曲率模态和模态柔度曲率3种损伤定位识别方法的基本原理,以模态柔度差、曲率模态差和模态柔度曲率差为识别参数对简支梁结构损伤定位进行了数值模拟的对比分析。结果表明,当结构单处损伤时,3种参数均能有效识别损伤位置,当结构多处损伤时,曲率模态差和模态柔度曲率差比模态柔度差具有更好的识别精度。 The structural dynamic parameters can be obtained by modal analysis of dynamic measurement data, and the change of the obtained parameters can thereby identify the struc- tural damage location in civil engineering. Three fundamental theories of identifying damage lo- cation are presented, that is, modal flexibility, curvature mode and modal flexibility curva- ture. Using the change in modal flexibility, the change in curvature mode and the change in modal flexibility curvature as identifying parameters, comparative studies are carried out by numerical simulation of one simply supported beam. The results show that each of the three methods is effective in identifying single damage location while the change in curvature mode and the change in modal flexibility curvature are more accurate for multiple damage locations than the change in modal flexibility.
出处 《金陵科技学院学报》 2012年第4期35-39,共5页 Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology
关键词 损伤诊断 模态柔度 曲率模态 模态柔度曲率 damage identification modal flexibility curvature mode modal flexibility curvature
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1张启伟.桥梁结构模型修正与损伤识别:博士学位论文[D].上海:同济大学桥梁工程系,1999.
  • 2崔飞.桥梁参数识别与承载力评估:博士学位论文[D].上海:同济大学桥梁工程系,2000.
  • 3Wang,B.S., Liang,X.B., and Ni, Y.Q., et al. Comparative study of damage indices in application to a long-span suspension bridge[A]. Proceedings of the Intemational Confereace on Advances in Semctural Dynamics[C].Hong Kong: the Hongkong Polytechnic Unlversity, 2000,12:1085-1092.
  • 4Stubbs, N., and Kim,J.T.. Damage localization in structures without baseline model parameters. AIAA. J.. 1996. 34(8): 1644-1649.
  • 5Housner, GW., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K, et al. Structural Control:Past, Present, and Future[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE,1997, 123(9): 897-971.
  • 6Salzwu, O.S.. Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency:a review[J]. Engineering Structures, 1997, 19(9): 718-723.
  • 7Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B., et al. A review of damage identification methods that examine changes in dynamic properties[J].Shock and Vibration Dig., 1998, 30(2): 91-105.
  • 8Zou, Y., Tong, L., and Steven, GP.. Vibration-based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures--a review[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 230(2):357-378.
  • 9Zong, Z,H.. Wang, T.L., et al. State-of-the art report of bridge health monitoring[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science), 2002, 30(2): 127-152.
  • 10Doebling S W.Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics:a literature review[R].Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13070-MS,1996.

共引文献213

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部