期刊文献+

泽菲与多西他赛维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 被引量:2

Treatment of gemzar or taxotere maintenance therapy on advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同维持治疗方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法选择ⅢB~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌,经4周期标准泽菲、顺铂化疗方案治疗病情未进展的患者60例,将其随机分为A、B、C 3组,A组给予泽菲与对症支持治疗;B组给予多西他赛与对症支持治疗;C组仅给予对症支持治疗。以中位无进展生存时间(PFS)作为观察终点,比较泽菲与多西他赛维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效、不良反应及生存期。结果 A、B、C 3组PFS分别为5.9、6.2和2.8个月,3组患者中位PFS比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组与B组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论泽菲与多西他赛维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌安全有效,能延长患者的PFS,且不良反应轻。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy, toxicity and the median progression-free survival (PFS) of gemzar or taxotere in maintenance therapy of advanced non-small cell iung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 60 patients diagnosed with advanced non-smalI cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study. After 4 courses of standard gemzar and cisplatin chemotherapy,the treatment conditions of 60 patients did not progress, and then they were randomly divided into group A, B and C. group A were given Gemzar and support treatment, group B given Taxotere and support treatment, group C given only support treatment. Taking median PFS as end point. Results PFSs of groups A, B,C were 5.9,6.2, 2.8 months,respectively,there was significant difference in median PFS (P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in side effect occurrence between group A and group B (P〉0.05). Conclusion It is safe and effective to treat advanced NSCLC with gemzar or taxotere.
出处 《西部医学》 2013年第3期425-427,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 泽菲 多西他赛 维持治疗 Non-small cellIung cancer Gemzar Taxotere Maintenance therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Breathnach OS, Freidlin B, Conley B, et al. Twenty-two yearsof phaseIIItrials for patients with advanced non-small-celllung canc- er: sobering results[J]. J Clin Oneoh2001,19 : 1734-1742.
  • 2吴国明,范晔.晚期非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗研究进展及思考[J].西部医学,2012,24(1):1-4. 被引量:25
  • 3陆舜,顾琳萍.2008年肺癌治疗的新突破·中国临床肿瘤学教育专辑(2008)[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008t28-35.
  • 4Goldie JH,Coldman AJ, Gudauskas GA. Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Treat Rep, 1982,66 : 439-449.
  • 5Day RS. Treatment sequencing, asymmetry, and uncertainty: pro- tocol strategies for combination chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Res, 1986,46 : 3876-3885.
  • 6Brodowiez T, krzakowski M, Zwitter M, et al. Cisplatin and gem-citabine first-line chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcit- abine or best supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung eane- er:A phaseIII trial[J]. Lung Cancer,2006,52(2) :155-163.
  • 7Fidias PM,Dakhil SR,Lyss AP,et al. PhaseIII study of immediate compared with delayed dO (-etaxel after front-line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in advanced uon-rsmall-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27 : 591-598.

二级参考文献21

  • 1C. Gridelli, et al. International multicenter randomized phase III study of first-line erlotinib (E) followed by second-line cisplatin plus gemcitabine (CG) versus first-line CG followed by second-line E in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) [J]. ASCO, 2010, Abstract 7508.
  • 2Y. Bang, et al. Clinical activity of the oral ALK inhibitor PF- 02341066 in ALK-positive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J]. ASCO, 2010 Abstract 3.
  • 3M. J. Boyer et al. Efficacy and safety of PF299804 versus erlotinib (E) : A global, randomized phase Ⅱ trial in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of chemotherapy (CT)[J]. ASCO, 2010, Abstract 7523.
  • 4C. Yang, et al. A phase II study of BIBW 2992 in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and activating EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 2).
  • 5Tony Mok, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with epidermai growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (Mut) in IPASS 2009 WCLC Abstract B9.5.
  • 6Jin S. Lee et al. First-SIGNAL To examine the role of Gefitinib as first-line therapy in never-smoker lung cancer patients with adenocarcinoma as compared with standard chemotherapy Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin 2009 WCLC Abstract PRS. 4.
  • 7Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel carboplatin a- lone or with bevacizumab for non-smallcell lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2006, 355:2542-2550.
  • 8Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Manegold C, et al. Gefitinib in combination with gcmcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase Ⅲ trial-INTACT 1[J]. J Clin Oncol, 22: 777-784.
  • 9Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, et al. TRIBUTE: A phase Ⅲ trial of erlotinib hydroehloride (OSI-774) combined with earboplatin and paelitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung eaneer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2005, 23:5892-5899.
  • 10Herbst RS, Giaeeone G, Schiller JH, et al. Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, A phase Ⅲ trial-INTACT 2[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22:785-794.

共引文献24

同被引文献26

  • 1林丽珠,陶志广,周岱翰.WHO标准和RECIST在肺癌多中心疗效评价的比较[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(5):253-255. 被引量:41
  • 2白春学.内科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:3.
  • 3Schiller JH, Harrington D. Comparison of four chemothera- py regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. N. Engl J Med, 2002,346 : 92-98.
  • 4Zhou C,Wu YL,Chen G,et al. Erlotinib versus chemother- apy as first treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol,2011,12(8) :735-742.
  • 5Dansin E, Cousin S,Lauridant,et al. Bevacizumab in tho- racic oncology: Results and practical aspects[J]. Rev Pneu- mol Clin ,2013,69(3) : 159-169.
  • 6Zhang L,Ma S,Song X,et al. Gefitinib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012,13(5) :466-475.
  • 7Paz Ares L,de Marinis F,Dedin M,et al. Maintenance therapy with pcmetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lancet 0ncol,2012, 13(3): 247-255.
  • 8Fidias P M,Dakhi] S R,Lyss LP,et al. Phase III study of immediate compared with delayed docetaxel after front- line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in ad- vanced non-small cell lung caner[J]. Clin 0ncol,2009,27 (4) :591-598.
  • 9Ueno H,Loka T,Keda M,et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1,S-I alone,or gemcitabine alone in patients with !ocally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan:GEST study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012,31 : 1640-1648.
  • 10Yamamoto Y, Nishmrua R,Tanigawa T,et al. Efficacy and safety of S-1 mono-therapy for advanced or metastatic. breast cancer:An observational study by the Kumamoto Breast Caner Cooperative Group(KBCCG)[J]. Gan To Ka- gaku Ryoho, 2014, 41 (10) : 1221 - 1225.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部