期刊文献+

两种检波器GS-One和SM-24的二维地震对比测试

Field test comparison between GS-One with SM-24 geophone for 2D seismic survey
下载PDF
导出
摘要 进行检波器(地震道或采集道)的野外测试对比,是地震勘探设备在生产使用期间经常要做的基本工作,也是地震勘探设备初次投产使用必须要做的工作。本文以哥伦比亚实施的一个二维地震采集项目为例,对该项目中布设在同一测线的相同桩号处的SM-24检波器串和单只GS-One检波器所获取的两组数据,从原始记录的振幅及相位谱、初叠、时移剖面、衰减等方面进行了对比,详细对比剖析了它们在采集效果上的差异。所有的对比显示两者差别很小或没差异。GS-One的数据比SM-24检波器串的数据的振幅低1.14dB;在施工方面搬运GS-One比SM-24少用一半人工。 Field test comparison for geophone must be doing before putting into seismic exploration operation and also is an ordinary job during the production period. This paper took the a 2-D seismic acquisition project conducted in Co- lumbia as an example, compared acquisition data from two sets of geophone( SM-24 and GS-One) from the original recording amplitude and phase spectra, raw records, brute stacks, time-migrated sections, and AVO responses etc. All of these comparisons showed little to no differences. The single sensor data showed RMS amplitudes that were a constant 1.14 dB below those of the 6-phone string data. Operationally, the geophysical contractor noted that the personnel required to move single phone stations was about half that required for the 6-element stations
出处 《物探装备》 2013年第1期26-28,共3页 Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting
关键词 GS—One SM-24 高灵敏检波器 灵敏度 二维地震 GS-One, SM-24, high-sensitivity geophone, sensitivity, 2D seismic survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1ION Products. Sensor Geophones website, http ://www. geophone, com/techpapers/Geophone-brochure, pd{, 2001- 12-13.
  • 2Geospace Website. http.-ff www. oyogeospace, corn/tech- nologies/index, php? id= 28,2001-12-13.
  • 3Sercel Website. http.-ff www. sercel, com/brochures/Geo- phoneshydrophones, pdf,2001-12-13.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部