期刊文献+

256层螺旋CT血管成像后处理技术在脾动脉瘤诊断中的应用

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨256层螺旋cT血管成像的后处理技术对脾动脉瘤的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析经手术证实的16例脾动脉瘤(共20个脾动脉瘤)患者的CTA资料,由2位副主任医师对图像进行容积再现(volume rendering,VR),最大密度投影(maximum intensity projection,MIP),多平面重组(multiplannar reconstruction,MPR)等后处理,分别计算VR、MIP、MPR、vR+MIP+MPR后处理技术诊断脾动脉瘤的灵敏度、特异度、误诊率、漏诊率和Youden指数。结果VR诊断脾动脉瘤的灵敏度94.74%、特异度75%、误诊率5.26%、漏诊率25%、Youden指数0.73。MIP分别为94.12%、60%、5.88%、40%及0.54。MPR分别为93.75%、54.55%、6.25%、45.45%及0.48。vR+MIP+MPR分别为95%、85.71%、5%、14.29%及0.81。结论256层螺旋CT血管成像的多种后处理技术的联合应用能显著提高脾动脉瘤的诊断。 Objective To evaluate the value of 256-slice CT angiography and different post-processings in the diagnosis of splenic aneurysm. Methods 16 patients with splenic aneurysm ( 20 splenic aneurysms total ) were retrospectively reviewed for their imaging findings. All of them were underwent 256-slice spiral CT angiography and data collected were processed using VR, MIP and MPR, the images were analysed by two experienced radiologists, the sensitivity, specificity, mistake diagnostic rate, omission diagnostic rate and the Youden index of the VR, MIP, MPR and all of them together were compared respectively.Results The sensitivity, specificity, mistake diagnostic rate, omission diagnostic rate and the Youden index in detection ofaneurysms were94.74%, 75%, 5.26%, 25%, 0.73 respectively withVR; 94.12%, 60%, 5.88%, 40%, 0.54 respectively withMIP; 93.75%, 54.55%, 6.25%, 45.45%, 0.48 respectively withMPR; 95%, 85.71%, 5%, 14.29%, 0.81 respectively with VR, MIP and MPR together. Conclusion The combination of the different post-processings of 256-slice spiral CT angiography can improve the diagnosis of the splenic aneurysm obviously.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2013年第3期317-319,共3页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 脾动脉 体层摄影术 X线计算机 动脉瘤 血管造影术 Splenic artery Tomography X-ray computed Aneurysm Angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

  • 1陆菁菁,潘杰,李明利,金征宇,王云,梁继祥,陶蔚,连伟.多层螺旋CT三维血管成像在颅内动脉瘤评价中的初步应用——与DSA的对比研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(1):17-20. 被引量:29
  • 2郑鸿.现代腹部外科学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1996:524-525.
  • 3Addis KA, Hopper KD, Lyriboz TA, et al. CT angiog Taphy:in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods [ J ]. Am J Roentgenol, 2001,177(5) :1171-1176.
  • 4Franklin B,Gasco J,Uribe T,et al.Diagnostic accuracy and interrater reliability of 64multislice 3DCTA compared to intraarterial DSA for intracranial aneurysms[J].J Clin Neurosci,2010,17(5):579-583.
  • 5Watanable Y,Uotani K,Nakazawa T,et al.Dualenergy direct bone removal CT angiography for evalution of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis;comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography[J].Eur Radiol,2009,19(4):1019-1023.
  • 6Romijn M,Gratama van Andel H A,Walderveen M A,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms:comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography[J].Am J Neuroradiol,2008,29(1):134-139.
  • 7Schievink I.W. Intracranial aneurysms. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1997, 336:28
  • 8Jayaraman MV, Yayo-Smith WW, Tung GA,et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms: multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA. Radiology, 2004, 230:510
  • 9King JT Jr. Epidemiology of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrage. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 1997, 7:659
  • 10Villablancaa J.P, Jahana R, Hooshia P,et al. Detection and charac-terization of very small aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. AJNR, 2002, 23:1187

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部