期刊文献+

不同表面形态的黏砂变形GFRP筋与混凝土之间的黏结性能 被引量:4

Bond Behaviors between Sand-coated GFRP Rebar and Concrete in Different Surface Conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于27个Losberg拉拔试验,对不同表面形态的黏砂变形玻璃纤维(GFRP)筋与混凝土之间的黏结性能进行了较为系统的研究.研究表明:GFRP筋与混凝土之间的黏结应力-滑移(τ-S)曲线可分为上升段、下降段和振荡段3段,其中上升段又可分为微滑移段和滑移段;黏砂变形GFRP筋的肋间距越大,则相应的τ-S曲线振荡段波谷之间的距离也越大;对于2种不同表面形态的黏砂变形GFRP筋(Aslan-1和Aslan-2),其破坏模式包括拔出和劈裂2种;黏砂变形GFRP筋试件的黏结强度约为钢筋试件的84.2%~98.6%;相比于黏砂变形Aslan-1 GFRP筋,Aslan-2 GFRP筋黏砂颗粒较细,且分布更均匀,黏砂层略厚,与混凝土之间的黏结强度略高10%左右;随着筋直径的增大和混凝土强度的降低,2种不同表面形态的黏砂变形GFRP筋试件与混凝土之间的黏结强度均有所降低. Based on tests of 27 Losberg pull-out specimens, the bond behaviors between sand-coated GFRP rebar and concrete in dif- ferent surface conditions were systematically analyzed. Test results showed that the experimental bond stress-slip curves between GFRP rebar and concrete (r-S curve) was divided into ascending stage, descending stage and oscillating stage, and the ascending stage could be divided into the micro-slippage stage and slippage stage; with larger rib spacing of sand-coated GFRP rebar, higher spacing between troughs of the oscillating stage was obtained ; for two kind of the sand-coated GFRP rebar specimens with different surfaces, the failure modes included pullout failure and splitting failure; the bond strength of sand-coated GFRP rebar with concrete was 84.2% - 98.6% of that of the deformed steel; compared with the Aslan-1 sand-coated GFRP rebar, the bond strength of Aslan-2 sand-coated GFRP rebar with finer, better-distributed and thicker sand was 10% higher; the bond strengths of the two kinds of sand-coated GFRP rebar with different surfaces decreased along with the increase of the rebar diameter and the reduction of the concrete strength.
出处 《华北水利水电学院学报》 2013年第1期7-10,共4页 North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50978193) 交通部西部交通建设科技项目(200631882244) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0636)
关键词 黏砂变形GFRP筋 表面形态 混凝土 破坏模式 黏结应力-滑移曲线 黏结强度 sand-coated GFRP rebar surface condition concrete failure mode bond stress-slip curve bond strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Larry G, Pleimann. Strength, modulus of elasticity, and bond of deformed FRP rods[J]. Advanced Composites Materials in Civil Engineering Structures, 1991,99 - 110.
  • 2Alunno R, Osseit V, Galeota D, et al. Local bond stress-slip relationships of glass fiber reinforced plastic bars embedded in concrete[ J ]. Materials and Structures, 1995,28:340 - 344.
  • 3薛伟辰,康清梁.纤维塑料筋粘结锚固性能的试验研究[J].工业建筑,1999,29(12):5-7. 被引量:35
  • 4Tighiouart B, Benmokrane B, Gao D. Investigation of bond in concrete member with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars [ J ]. Construction and Building Materials, 1988, 12 (8) :453 -462.
  • 5薛伟辰,郑乔文,杨雨.黏砂变形GFRP筋黏结性能研究[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(12):59-68. 被引量:21
  • 6中国建筑科学研究院.GB50152-92混凝土结构试验方法标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1992.
  • 7Zenon Achillides, Kypros Pilakoutas. Bond behavior of fiber reinforced polymer bars under direct pullout conditions [ J ]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004,8 ( 2 ) : 173 - 181.

二级参考文献10

共引文献55

同被引文献58

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部