期刊文献+

品牌印象结构及其测量研究 被引量:5

Research on the Structure of Brand Impression and Its Measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 品牌印象是消费者基于对品牌信息的感知和体验而在头脑中留下的品牌部分或整体信息。在文献研究和关键事件访谈的基础上,通过筛选条目、形成初步问卷、预测验和正式测验等程序,经探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,重测信度、聚合效度、辨别效度、法则效度和效标关联效度等检验,发现全方位的品牌印象由品牌质量印象、品牌传播印象、品牌服务印象和品牌价格印象等四个维度构成。用于测量品牌印象的多维量表、各维单项目量表和单项目量表均具有较好的信度和效度。 Brand impression is defined as a part or overall effect of brand in consumer' s mind based on his or her perception and experience of the brand information. Chinese citizen' s brand impression has been investigated by using the methods of Behavioral Event Interview and questionnaire. With a multi - step study to develop and validate a multidimensional brand impression scale, the empirical results indicate that the structure of brand impression includes four factors such as brand quality impression, brand communication impression, brand service impression and brand price impression. Multi - step psychometric tests demonstrate that the brand impression multidimensional scale which includes 15 items is reliable and valid,the scale of single item for every dimension and the scale of single item ate also.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2013年第1期87-95,共9页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70971058 71171063) 广东省高等学校人才引进项目 广东外语外贸大学引进人才科研启动项目 江西省研究生创新专项资金项目(YC2011-B014)
关键词 品牌印象 结构 测量 brand impression structure measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1238
  • 2Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review, 78 ( 3 ), 171 - 206.
  • 3Asch,S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,41,303 -314.
  • 4Ballantyne, R. , Warren, A. , & Nobbs, K. ( 2006 ). The evolution of brand choice. The Journal of Brand Management, 13,339 - 352.
  • 5Bergkvist, L. , & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple - item versus single - item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research,44,175 - 184.
  • 6Borsboom, D. , Mellenbergh, G. J. , & Heerden, J. V. ( 2004 ). The concept of validity. Journal of Psychology Review ,3 ( 4 ), 1061 - 1071.
  • 7Campbell, D. R. , & Fiske, D. W. ( 1959 ). Convergent and dis- criminant validation by the multitrait - multi - method matrix. Psychological Bulletin,56,81 - 105.
  • 8Fichter, C. , & Jonas, K. (2008). Image effects of newspapers - how brand images change consumers' product ratings. Jour- nal of Psychology,216 (4), 226 - 234.
  • 9Fiske,S. T. ,& Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impres- sion formation from category - based to individuating proces- ses:Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23,1 - 74.
  • 10Levy, S. J. (2003). Roots of marketing and consumer research at the university of Chicago. Consumption, Markets and Culture,6 (2) ,99 -110.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1237

同被引文献78

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部