期刊文献+

“后现代主义”语境中的公共行政概念 被引量:8

The Concept of Public Administration under the Postmodernism Context
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪后期,后现代主义思潮逐渐渗透到了公共行政的研究之中,为公共行政学科带来了一种后现代气息。后现代公共行政宣布了现代主义公共行政的失败,要求公共行政改变其控制导向,批评公共行政的控制追求引发了社会群体间的对抗,提出在公共行政中建立起包容他者与包容差异的文化。后现代公共行政显然是对现代主义公共行政的一种反叛,因而,遭遇了现代主义公共行政护卫者的猛烈反击,双方形成了一种激烈的交锋。在这种交锋中,后现代公共行政更加充分的阐释了解构现代公共行政的立场和观点。 By the late 20th century, postmodemism has gradually penetrated into the study of public administration, bringing some postmodern flavor to the discipline of Public Administration. The emergence of postmodem public administration announced the failure of the modernist public administration, required public administration to change its control-orientation, criticized of public administration's pursuit of control for evoking confrontation between social groups, and proposed to establish a culture in public administration which is inclusive of others and differences. Postmodem public administration is clearly a rebel against modernist public administration, thus it suffered a fierce counterattack from guardians of modernist public administration, and the two sides fought a vigorous battle. In this battle, postmodem public administration fully interpreted its standpoint and opinions of deconstructing modernist public administration.
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期39-46,共8页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 中国人民大学国家重点学科行政管理专业资助项目
关键词 后现代主义 公共行政 黑堡宣言解构 postmodernism public Administration deconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1ORION F. WHITE, JR.The Ideology Empiricism and the Discourse of Technocratic Movement in Contemporary Public Administration: A Clarification [J] Administration & Society, VoL 30, No. 4,1998: 471-476.
  • 2GARY S. MARSHALL, ORION F. WHITE, JR. The Blacksburg Manifesto and the Postmodem Debate: Public Administration in a Time Without a Name [J]. The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 20, No. 2,1990:61-76.
  • 3GARY L. WAMSLEY, JAMES F. WOLF.Can a High-Modem Project Find Happiness in a Postmodem Era?[C]// GARY L. WAMSLEY, JAMES F. WOLF. Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modem Paradoxes, Postmodem Challenges. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1996 : 24.
  • 4O. C. MCSWITE.Postmodemism, Public Administration, and the Public Interest [C]// GARY L. WAMSLEY, JAMES F. WOLF. Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modem Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1996.
  • 5GARY S. MARSHALL , ENAMUL CHOUDHURY. Public Administration and the Public Interest: Re- Presenting a Lost Concept [J].American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 41, No. 1,1997:119-131.
  • 6DAVID JOHN FARMER. Derrida, Deconstruction, and Public Administration [J]. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 41, No. 1,1997.
  • 7LINDA F. DENNARD.The Democratic Potential in the Transition of Postmodernism: From Critique to Social Evolution[J].American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1997 : 148-162.
  • 8福克斯.后现代公共行政[M].楚艳红,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
  • 9麦克斯怀特.公共行政的合法性:一种话语分析[M].吴琼译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.2002.
  • 10MICHAEL W. SPICER.Public Administration and the State: A Postmodem Perspective [M].Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 2001.

共引文献8

同被引文献58

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部