期刊文献+

奥氮平换用齐拉西酮治疗精神分裂症的安全性和有效性研究 被引量:57

Switching from olanzapine to ziprasidone:a 12-Week,open-label,multicenter study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ziprasidone in patients with schizophrenia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不能耐受奥氮平治疗或经奥氮平治疗无效的精神分裂症患者换用齐拉西酮治疗12周的安全性和有效性。方法 100例不能耐受奥氮平治疗或治疗无效、符合美国精神疾病诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-IV)精神分裂症诊断标准、首次发作或非难治性复发精神分裂症患者,换用可变剂量的齐拉西酮治疗12周。分别于基线和治疗第2、4、8、12周末进行疗效评估,包括阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)、卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDSS)、临床总体印象量表(CGI)、生活质量量表(SF-12)。分别于基线和治疗第4、8周末进行安全性评估,包括锥体外系不良反应量表(SAS)、实验室检查和心电图检查。采用重复测量方差分析进行统计学分析。结果86例患者完成实验。PANSS总分随观察时点变化有显著性降低(P<0.001),多项抑郁症状(CDSS评估)、临床总体印象(CGI评分)及社会功能(SF-12评估)随观察时点变化有显著改善(P<0.001)。有完整的不良反应记录共61例,常见的锥体外系不良反应22例(36.07%),相对少见的不良反应10例(16.39%),包括激越2例(3.28%)、恶心1例(1.64%)、便秘1例(1.64%)、失眠1例(1.64%)、头晕1例(1.64%)、头痛1例(1.64%)、焦虑1例(1.64%)、口干1例(1.64%)、心动过速1例(1.64%)。空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、甘油三酯、总胆固醇和催乳素以及心电图QTc间期和心率随观察时点的变化无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论不能耐受奥氮平治疗或经奥氮平治疗无效的患者换用齐拉西酮治疗后,临床症状显著改善,不良反应较少,对代谢指标的影响小。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of switching to ziprasidone from olanzapine because of inadequate response or intolerance. Methods A total of 100 patients with first-episode or non-refractory schizophrenia (diagnosed according with the criteria of DSM-IV ) who had no response to olanzapine or showed poor tolerance to alanzapine were enrolled in a 12-week, open-label, flexible-dose ziprasidone trial. All patients were assessed with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Calgary Depression Scale (CDSS), global impression scale (CGI) and Social Functions (SF-12) at baseline and the end of 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week to evaluate the efficacy. Extrapyramidal Side Effects Scale (SAS), laboratory examination and electrocardiogram examination were performed to evaluate the safety at baseline and the end of the 4th, 8th week of the treatment. Results A total of 86 patients completed the trial. Scores of PANSS, CDSS, CGI and SF-12 all decreased significantly with the advance of the treatment (P 〈 0. 001 ). 61 complete records of adverse reactions were collected. The most common adverse reaction was extrapyramidal effect ( 32 cases, 36.07% ). The prevalence of relatively rare adverse reactions was 16. 39% ( 10 cases) , which consisted of agitation (2 cases) , nausea ( 1 case) , constipation ( 1 case) , insomnia ( 1 case) , dizziness (1 case), headache (1 case), anxiety (1 case), dry mouth (1 case) and tachycardia (1 case). There were no significant changes in fasting glucose, HbA1 c, triglyceride, total cholesterol, prolactin, QTc interval, heart rate at different observation time-points with the advance of the treatment. Conclusion Ziprasidone can improve the clinical symptoms effectively in patients who had no response to olanzapine or showed poor tolerance to alanzapine. Ziprasidone has less adverse reactions and has little effect on metabolism.
出处 《精神医学杂志》 2013年第1期5-8,共4页 Journal of Psychiatry
基金 国家科技重大专项(编号:2011ZX09302-004)
关键词 齐拉西酮 奥氮平 精神分裂症 Ziprasidone Olanzapine Schizophrenia
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Canadian Psychiatric Association. Clinical practice guidelines: treatment of schizophrenia [J]. Can J Psychiatry, 2005, 50 (1): 7-57.
  • 2Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D, et al. Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2009, 373(9657):31 -41.
  • 3Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, et al. Effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia following discontinuationof a previous atypical antipsychotic [ J ]. Am J Psychiatry, 2006, 163(4) : 611 -622.
  • 4Rnmmel-Kluge C, Komossa K, Sehwarz S, et al. Head-to- head comparisons of metabolic side effects of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. Schizophr Res, 2010. 123(2 -3) : 225 -233.
  • 5Stip E, Anselmo K. Effectiveness of antipsychotics: is the CATIE trim a tsunami? [J]. Can Fam Physician, 2007, 53 : 97 - 98.
  • 6Alptekin K, Hafez J, Brook S, et al. Efficacy and tolera- bility of switching to ziprasidone from olanzapine, risperidone or haloperidol : an international, multicenter study [ J ]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol,2009, 24 : 229 - 238.
  • 7Fagiolini A, Canas F, Gallhofer B, et al. Strategies for succe- ssful clinical management of schizophrenia with ziprasidone [ J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother,2010,11 ( 13 ) :2199 - 2220.
  • 8司天梅,杨建中,舒良,王希林,孔庆梅,周沫,李雪霓,刘粹.阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS,中文版)的信、效度研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(1):45-47. 被引量:615
  • 9张鸿燕,肖卫东.评价精神分裂症的抑郁症状——卡尔加里精神分裂症抑郁量表[J].国际精神病学杂志,2006,33(1):8-12. 被引量:36
  • 10司天梅,黄继忠,于欣.Stahl精神药理学精要:神经科学基础与临床应用[M].3版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:330-359.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Addington D,Addington J,Atkinson M.Apsychometric com-parison of the Calgary Depression Scalefor Schizophrenia andthe Hamilton Depression Rating Scale[].Schizophrenia Research.1996
  • 2Bressan RA,Chaves AC,Shirakawa I,et al.Validity study of the Brazilian version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia[].Schizophrenia Research.1998
  • 3Lancon C,Auquier P,Reine G,et al.Study of the concurrent validity of the Calgary Depression Scale for schizophyrenica(CDSS)[].Journal of Affective Disorders.
  • 4Addington D,Addington J,Schissel B.A depression rating scale for schizophrenia[].Schizophrenia Research.1990
  • 5Addington D,AddingtonJ,Maticka TE.Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics[].Schizophrenia Research.1992
  • 6Addington D,Addington J,Maticka TE.Specificity of the Cal-gary Depression Scale for schizophrenica[].Schizophrenia Research.1994
  • 7何燕玲,张明园.阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)及其应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1997,7(6):353-355. 被引量:470
  • 8何燕玲,张明园.阳性和阴性症状量表的中国常模和因子分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2000,8(2):65-69. 被引量:296

共引文献647

同被引文献301

引证文献57

二级引证文献308

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部