期刊文献+

3株哈密瓜酒酵母的分子生物学鉴定 被引量:2

Identification of three Hami melon wine yeasts by molecular biology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对从哈密瓜酒生产中分离获得的3株哈密瓜酒酵母进行发酵性能分析,发现其中1株发酵异常。采用26S rDNA D1/D2区序列分析法对酵母进行分子鉴定,经序列比对及构建系统发育树分析,得出1号和3号酵母为酿酒酵母,与酿酒酵母模式菌株序列相似性在99%以上;2号酵母鉴定为高里毕赤酵母,与高里毕赤酵母(Pichia guilliermondii)相似性为99%。进一步对3株酵母的同源序列与其他种之间的发育关系进行了分析,发现有很好的相似度,表明26S rDNA D1/D2区域序列分析方法能够应用于酿酒酵母的分子生物学鉴定,并可以作为生产中酵母污染检测的工具。 The fermentation performances of three yeasts isolated from the production of Hami melon wine were investigated. It was found that one of the three yeasts presented an abnormal fermentation phenomenon. The molecular identification of the three melon wine yeasts was carried out ac- cording to 26S rDNA D1/D2 sequence analysis. By sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree analysis, No.1 and No.3 yeasts were identified as Sac- charomyces cerevisiae with sequence similaritiesover 99% to S. cerevisiae, and No.2 strain was identified as Pichia guilliermondii with sequence sim- ilarity above 99% to P. guilliermondii. Furthermore, the homology relationship of the three yeasts and other species were analyzed and showed good similarity. The method of sequence analysis of 26S rDNA D1/D2 region can be used in molecular identification ofS. Cerevisiae, and can also be used as a tool for contamination detection in production.
作者 李晓华
出处 《中国酿造》 CAS 2013年第2期73-76,共4页 China Brewing
关键词 哈密瓜酒酵母 26S rDNAD1/D2区 序列分析 系统发育树 Hami melon wine yeast 26S rDNA D1/D2 region sequence analysis phylogenetic tree
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献39

  • 1王丽敏,李军,胡小松.苹果原料中酵母菌的分离鉴定[J].中国农业大学学报,2004,9(4):14-17. 被引量:25
  • 2李运,盛慧,赵荣华.Biolog微生物鉴定系统在菌种鉴定中的应用[J].酿酒科技,2005(7):84-85. 被引量:55
  • 3程池,李金霞,姚粟,胡海蓉.Biolog微生物自动鉴定系统在酿酒酵母鉴定中的应用[J].酿酒科技,2006(7):58-61. 被引量:13
  • 4[1]Bai FY, 1996. Separation of Candida fermentati comb. nov. from Candida guilliermondii by DNA base composition and electrophoretic karyotyping. Syst Appl Microbiol 19:178~181
  • 5[2]Bai FY, Liang HY, Jia JH, 2000. Taxonomic relationships among the taxa in the Candida guilliermondii complex, as revealed by comparative electrophoretic karyotyping. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 417~422
  • 6[3]Barnett JA, 1968. Biochemical differentiation of taxa with special reference to the yeasts. In Ainsworth GC and Sussman AS (eds.), The Fungi, An Advanced Treatise. Volume III, the Fungal Population. New York, Academic Press, .557~595
  • 7[4]Buckley HR, van Uden N, 1968. Five new Candida species. Mycopathol Mycol Appl 36: 257~266
  • 8[5]Felsenstein J, 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783~791
  • 9[6]Kurtzman CP, 1998. Pichia E.C. Hansen emend. Kurtzman. In Kurtzman C P and Fell JW (eds.), The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 273~352
  • 10[7]Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, 1997. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in 5' end of the large~subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 35: 1216~1223

共引文献117

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部