期刊文献+

基于非集计理论的驾驶适宜性度量模型 被引量:1

Metric Model of Driving Suitability Based on Disaggregate Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为量化驾驶人的驾驶适宜性,丰富对其的检测理论和方法,应用非集计理论中的多项分对数(MNL)模型构建驾驶适宜性度量模型。模型以驾驶人一定时间内事故发生次数作为选择肢,以个人固有属性、生理心理属性14项指标作为影响因素,并根据200份实际调查数据标定各影响因素参数。另外,选取60份数据验证该模型。结果显示:14项指标参数检验值均小于1.96,各参数统计学意义显著;模型判定系数为0.364 748,表明模型拟合程度较高;且该模型计算值与统计值最大绝对误差仅为3.3%,表明模型精度较高,可用于预测驾驶适宜性。 In order to quantify the driving suitability, enrich its detection theory and methods, a driving suitability measurement model was built based on MNL model of the disaggregate theory. The number of accidents in a period of time were selected as the alternatives, then individual intrinsic attributes, the physiological and psychological attributes of driver totaled 14 as the influencing factors, then parameters of each factor were demarcated based on actual survey of 200 data. Another 60 driver data were selected to testify the model' s validity. The results show that 14 parameters' test values are less than 1.96, they have high significance levels in statistics, that the coefficient of determination is 0. 364 748, indicating a high degree of model fit, and the maximum absolute error between statistical values and computational val- ues by MNL is 3.3% , the model has high accuracy to predict the driving suitability.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期10-15,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(51178158) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(20120111120021) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2011HGBZ0936 2011HGQC1018)
关键词 交通安全 驾驶适宜性 事故倾向性 非集计理论 多项分对数(MNL)模型 traffic safety driving suitability accident proneness disaggregate theory multinomial logit (MNL) model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1JIN Hui-qing, Shunichi ARAKI, WU Xi-ke, et al. Neurobehavioral study on accident-prone motor-vehicle drivers in China[J]. Industrial Health, 1991,29(1) :23 - 26.
  • 2Greenwood M, Woods H M. The incidence of industrial accidents upon individuals with special reference to multiple acci- dents. Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee [C]. Report No. 4. Her Britannic Majesty' s Stationary Office,London, 1919:384 - 389.
  • 3Adelstain A M. Acciden(proneness: a criticism of the concept based on an analysis of shunters' accidents[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1952, 115(3):354 -410.
  • 4Bernacki [J. Accident proneness of accident liability: Which model for industry[ J]. Connecticut Medicine, 1976, 40(8) :535 -538.
  • 5Thali A. Accidents and their sequelae have psychosomatic characteristics: do accidents happen by chance.9 [ J]. Kran- kenpfl Soins Infirm, 1987, 80(10) :72 - 76.
  • 6Petz B. The human factor in aeeidents[J]. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol, 1994, 45(3):249 -273.
  • 7JIN Hui-qing. Driving Suitability[ M]. Hefei : Anhui People' s Publishing House, 1995 : 5 - 29.
  • 8JIN Hui-qing, Shuniehi ARAKI, WU Xi-ke, et al Psychological performance of accident-prone automobile drivers in China: A case-control study[J]. International Journal of Epidemiolo, 1991,20(1) :230-233.
  • 9金会庆,宋扬,张树林,余皖生.基于事故倾向性理论的交通事故预防系统控制模型的构建[J].人类工效学,2011,17(1):73-77. 被引量:14
  • 10李百川,孙建宏,肖利军.中国职业汽车驾驶员适宜性检测标准制订研究[J].安全与环境学报,2001,1(3):7-10. 被引量:26

二级参考文献48

共引文献90

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部