期刊文献+

核电厂主控室数字化对人执行状态评估任务影响 被引量:1

Effects of Digitalized Main Control Room on Operators' Implementing Situation Assessment Tasks in Nuclear Power Plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 核电厂主控室进行数字化变革后,操纵员执行状态评估任务的方式发生了巨大变化。为了有效地识别及评估数字化对状态评估的潜在影响,以知觉/循环、资源限制等认知理论为基础,以贝叶斯概率网络为工具,建立状态评估可靠度的影响因素模型。定性分析这些因素对状态评估任务的影响机制,并定量比较它们的影响程度。分析结果表明,界面管理任务和任务负荷变迁,对状态评估的影响最为显著。需采取针对性的措施,优先处理这些人因问题,以最大限度地提高数字化核电厂的安全水平。 It was held that after the introduction of digitalized technology for main control room in nuclear power plant, the way operators perform situation assessment tasks was dramatically changed, and that the potential human factor issues arising from digitalization needed to be identified, and their effects on opera- tors'situation assessment must be evaluated. Based on Adamg perception/action cycle theory and Norman resource-limited theory, and taking Bayesian network as an inference method, a structured causal model for analyzing the effects of digitalization on situation assessment was built. It not only revealed the mecha- nisms the human factor issues affected situation assessment, but also prioritized their influences quantita- tively. The results indicate that interface management tasks and task load transition influence the reliability of situation assessment significantly. In order to improve the margin of safety for digitalized nuclear power plant, corresponding measures were proposed.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期41-47,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(70873040 71071051) 岭东核电有限公司科研项目资助(KR70543) 湖南省教育厅项目资助(10C1139)
关键词 数字化主控室 状态评估 人的可靠性分析 情景意识 人为差错 digitalized main control room situation assessment human reliability analysis situation awareness human error
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1EPRI Nuclear Safety Analysis Center. Analysis of Three Mile Island-Unit 2 accident[R]. Washington DC: US Electric Power Research Institute, NSAC-80-1, 1979.
  • 2Hara J M, Brown W S, Lewis P M, et al. The Effects of Interface Management Tasks on Crew Performance and Sety in Complex, Computer-Based Systems[R]. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6690, 2002.
  • 3Kim M C, Seong P I-l. A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessement of nuclear power plant operators[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009,94(11) : 1 796 - 1 805.
  • 4Adams M J, Tenney Y J, Pew R W. Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems[J]. Human Factors,1995, 37(1) : 85 - 104.
  • 5Norman D A, Bobrow D G. On data-limited and resource-limited processes[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7(1): 44-64.
  • 6Parasuraman R, Manzey D. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration[J] Human Factors, 2010, 52(3): 381 -410.
  • 7Woods D, Roth E, Stubler W, et al. Navigating through large display networks in dynamic control applications [C]. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, 1990:396 -399.
  • 8Hara J M, Higgins J C, Brown W S, et al. Human Factors Considerations with Respect to Emerging Technology in Nucle- ar Power Plants[R]. BNL-79947,.
  • 9New York: Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2008. Research on Human Factors in New Nuclear Plant Technology[ R]. CSNI Technical Opinion Papers, OECD/NEA-6844, 2009.
  • 10Matthews G, Desmond P A. Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving perfonnance[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2002, 55 (2) : 659 - 686.

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部