期刊文献+

地铁施工灾害关键警兆监测指标研究 被引量:6

Research on Key Monitoring Indicators of Subway Construction Disaster Warning Signs Based on WBS-RBS and Association Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为实现地铁施工灾害警兆的实时监测和重点跟踪,预防和减少地铁施工灾害的发生,应用WBS-RBS及关联规则对地铁施工灾害关键警兆监测指标进行科学选取。通过分析以往地铁施工事故,针对基坑工程采用WBS-RBS方法,全面识别施工过程中的风险源,并运用基坑工程警兆监测指标关联规则模型对"地墙渗漏"警兆的20组样本数据进行计算分析,得到警兆与监测指标的频繁项集,从而甄选出关键警兆监测指标。结果表明,由于关联规则的存在,当警兆监测指标组合中某个指标超过阈值时,组合中可能存在其他指标同时超过其指标阈值,因此这时应加强对其他指标的监测。 In order to realize the real-time monitoring of subway construction disaster warning signs and special tracking,then prevent and reduce the occurrence of the subway construction disasters, WBS-RBS and association rules were proposed to select the key monitoring indicators of subway construction disaster warning signs scientifically. Through the analysis of the subway construction accidents in the past, the WBS-RBS was used to look for the excavation engineering common monitoring indicators of warning signs, then an association rules model was used to analyze 20 sample data of the "wall seepage" warning sign, getting the frequent item sets of warning signs and monitoring indicators, selecting monitoring indicators of the key warning signs. The results show that due to the presence of association rules, when one monitoring indicator in a combination of monitoring indicators of warning signs exceeds the threshold, there may be a combination of other monitoring indicators exceeding the thresholds. In this case, it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring of other indicators in the combination.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期148-154,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(71173152)
关键词 工作分解结构法-风险分解结构法(WBS-RBS) 关联规则 基坑工程 警兆监测指标 地铁施工 work breakdown structure-risk breakdown structure (WBS-RBS) association rules excavation engineering monitoring indicators of warning signs subway construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1邓小鹏,李启明,周志鹏.地铁施工安全事故规律性的统计分析[J].统计与决策,2010,26(9):87-89. 被引量:83
  • 2Einstein H H, Vick S G. Geologic model for a tunnel model[ C]. Proceedings of Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Confer- ence, 1974 : 1 701 - 1 720.
  • 3Sturk R, Olsson L, Johansson J. Risk and decision analysis for large underground projects as applied to the Stockholm ring road tunnels[J]. Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11 (2) : 157 - 164.
  • 4Vik E A, Sverdrup L, Kelley A,et al. Experiences from environmental risk management of chemical grouting agents used during construction of the Romeriksporten tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground SpaceTechnology, 2000, 15(4) :369 -378.
  • 5Dnijvestijn A M W,Bout P. A new metro tunnel under Amsterdam central station with known risks[C]. (Re) Claiming the Underground Space, 2003 : 1 027 - 1 033.
  • 6The British Tunneling Society. The Joint Code of Practice for Risk Management of Tunnel Works in the UK[ S]. 2003.
  • 7The International Tunneling Insurance Group. A Code of Practice for Risk Management of Tunnel Works[S]. 2006.
  • 8Hyun-Ho Choi, Hyo-Nam Cho, J W Seo. Risk assessment methodology for underground construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2004,130(2) :258 -272. .
  • 9J W Seo, M ASCE, Hyun Ho Choi. Risk-based safety impact assessment methodology for underground construction projects in Korea[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ,2008,134( 1 ) :72 - 81.
  • 10张雁,黄宏伟.地铁及地下工程建设风险管理指南[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.

二级参考文献64

共引文献188

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部