期刊文献+

农地制、土地利用与可持续发展——以内蒙古一个村落的60年变迁为例 被引量:5

Tenure,Land Use and Sustainable Development——Evidence from 60 Years Changes in an Inner Mongolia Village
下载PDF
导出
摘要 农地制、土地利用与可持续发展是处于国际学术前沿的一个发展课题。迄今对中国乡村这三者之间关系所做的探究不单缺乏以社区为本的实证研究,而且往往忽视了村落层面非正规制度所起的作用。基于民族志田野调查,文章从历史视野勾勒了内蒙古一个村落以往60年土地利用活动的流变及与之伴生的生态后果,并探究了其背后的制度因素。研究揭示,这个村不断变化的土地利用实践是自上而下的国家正规制度与嵌入村落社区的非正规制度交互作用的结果。国家农地制度中所有权与使用权的分离、集体行动的弱化、社会资本的丧失以及市场经济的冲击等正规与非正规的制度机制的缺失都加剧了微观层面的不可持续性。这一切都折射了西部乃至全国各地带有普遍性的共同挑战,有助于拓宽并加深对农业和农村可持续发展的理解。 Sustainable agriculture and rural development has been influenced not only by tenure arrangements of the state, but also by institutional practices at the grassroots. Based on an ethnographic field research, this paper outlines dynamic changes of land use activities and their ecological outcomes, and explores the underlying institutional factors in an Inner Mongolia village of the last 60 years from historical perspectives. This study demonstrates that changing land use practices were the outcomes of the interactions of top-down national land tenure policies and localized informal institutions. The lack of institutional mechanisms of protecting land resources, particularly the separation of land use rights from ownership, the impacts of market penetration, weakening collective action and eroding social capital, has negatively impacted the pursuit of sustainability at the village level.
作者 胡玉坤
出处 《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第1期31-44,共14页 Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究2007年度规划基金项目"西部村落人口 资源与环境的互动:田野调查与对策研究"(07JA790017) 北京大学-林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心资助的"农村土地利用与可持续发展"项目 国家社会科学基金一般项目"国家与农村妇女就业--对西部三个村落60年变迁的比较研究"(09BSH030)的研究成果
关键词 农地制 内蒙古村落 土地利用 正规与非正规制度 可持续发展 Tenure Land use Sustainable development Village Informal institution
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Muldavin J. The Paradox of Environmental Policy and Resource Management in Reform-Era China. Economic Geog- raphy, 2000(3 ) :244 - 271.
  • 2FAO. Good Governance in Land Tenure and Administration. FAO Land Tenure Studies. Rome:FAO,2007,No. 9. ht- tp/J ftp. fao. org/docrep/fao/010/a1179e/a1179e00, pdf.
  • 3Adhikari D B, Lovett J C. Institutions and Collective Action: Does Heterogeneity Matter in Community-based Re- source Management? The Journal of Development Studies, 2006 ( 3 ) :426 - 445.
  • 4Agrawal A. Commons Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources. World Development, 2001 (10) : 1649 - 1672.
  • 5Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones L. Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community-based Natu- ral Resource Management. World Development, 1999 ( 2 ) :225 - 247.
  • 6Ballet J, Sirven N, Requiers-Desjardins M. Social Capital and Natural Resource Management. The Journal of Envi- ronment Development, 2007 ( 4 ) : 355 - 374.
  • 7Pretty J, Ward H. Social Capital and the Environment. World Development, 2001 (2) :209 -227.
  • 8Ostrom E. Governing the Commons : the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York : Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1990.
  • 9Hanson S, Lake R W. Needed: Geographic Research on Urban Sustainability. Economic Geography, 2000( 1 ) :1 -3.
  • 10North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

二级参考文献41

共引文献20

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部