我国刑法分则犯罪模式不应为既遂模式

Crime Pattern in China's Specific Provisions of Criminal Law not meaningthe Pattern of Completion of A Crime

犯罪构成要件齐备说所蕴含的逻辑结果是刑法分则条文规定的犯罪模式为既遂模式。我国刑法分则规定不应为既遂模式的理由:没有法律依据;我国刑法分则对各罪规定了宽泛的法定刑,应当包含未完成形态处罚在内;我国刑法分则有关预备犯与过失犯的立法例表明其犯罪模式不应为既遂模式;认为我国刑法分则规定非既遂模式不会对犯罪停止形态定罪量刑造成影响。我国刑法分则规定应为既遂模式带来的困惑:不利于认定犯罪未完成形态;会冲击犯罪构成及犯罪既遂的基本原理;导致对未遂犯等的定罪量刑失去法律依据。

Constitutive elements of a crime are all ready to be used for determination of consummation of a crime that means a pattern of consummation of a crime in the specific provisions of criminal law. Reasons that crime pattern in china＇s specific provisions of criminal law is not a pattern of completion of a crime contains： firstly, there is no legal basis, secondly, statutory sentence in specific provisions of criminal law contains punishment for unfinished form of a crime; thirdly, legislation of preparatory crime and negligent crime in specific provisions of criminal law means that completion of a crime does not exist; lastly, conviction and sentencing to criminal cessation pattern will not be influenced. Confusions that crime pattern in china＇s specific provisions of criminal law is not a pattern of completion of a crime con- tain： it is not conducive to determinate the unfinished form of a crime; it will attack basic principles of composition of a crime and completion of a crime; conviction and sentencing to unaccomplished offender will lose the legal basis.