期刊文献+

基于生态系统水平的河流风险评价 被引量:11

River risk assessment based on ecosystem level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有的生态风险评价方法主要围绕特定物质或特定受体,难以用于以生态系统为对象的管理.本研究依照系统生态学与复杂系统的理论概念,采取以"生态系统服务"作为生态系统水平的风险评价终点的做法,通过量化外界压力与生态系统服务的"压力-响应"模式,建立了基于生态系统水平的生态风险评价方法,并以黄河为案例说明这一方法的应用.结果显示,黄河生态系统的保护需要重点关注中下游河段,主要的风险源为城市和农业面源,需要重点保护生境及生物类目标.结果表明所建立的评价方法可为促进基于生态系统的河流管理提供技术支持. The current methods of ecological risk assessment (ERA) are difficult to be applied on ecosystem level, since they mainly focus on specific materials or species. An ecosystem-based river ERA method was developed depending on the concepts of system ecology and complex system theory. Distinguishingly, the method selected "Ecosystem Services" as assessment endpoints, and quantified "Pressure-Response" relationship between external stress on ecosystem and Ecosystem Services. Yellow River in China was chose as a case study. The results suggest that the most risky area of Yellow River ecosystem were middle and lower reaches; the main risk sources were urban and agriculture; and the most dangerous targets were habitats and biota. By its application in Yellow River, this method was showed to strongly support ecosystem-based river management.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期516-523,共8页 China Environmental Science
基金 环境保护部区域和行业重大发展战略环境评价项目
关键词 河流 生态系统 生态风险评价 生态系统服务 生态系统水平 河流管理 river: ecosystem: ecological riskassessment: ecosystem services: ecosystem level river management
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Bruins R J F, Heberling M T. Economics and ecological risk assessment: Applications to watershed management [M]. Boca Raton, USA: CRC PRESS, 2005.
  • 2US EPA. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment [R]. Washington D C: USEPA, 1998.
  • 3Haith D A. Ecological risk assessment of pesticide runoff from grass surfaces [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010,44(16):6496-6502.
  • 4吴艳阳,吴群河,叶嘉欣,黄珊,张仁铎.珠江广州段沉积物中PAHs生态风险的蒙特卡洛模拟[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(5):912-920. 被引量:4
  • 5邢立群,郑新梅,刘红玲,于红霞,张效伟.中国主要河流中硝基苯生态风险研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(2):301-306. 被引量:10
  • 6Tannenbaum L V. Moving beyond obsolete ecological risk assessments [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010,44 (9):3211-3212.
  • 7Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009,106(5):1305.
  • 8Ctmunins K W. Structure and function of stream ecosystems [J]. Bioscience, 1974,24(11):631-641.
  • 9Bilby R E, Likens G E. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems [J]. Ecology, 1980,61(5):1107-1113.
  • 10Auyang S Y. Foundations of complex-system theories: in economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics [M]. Washington, DC: Cambridge Univ Press, 1999.

二级参考文献63

共引文献196

同被引文献181

引证文献11

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部