期刊文献+

再生水在洗车利用中的暴露剂量研究 被引量:2

Exposure dose of reclaimed water for car wash
原文传递
导出
摘要 再生水暴露剂量确定是再生水洗车利用健康风险评价的前提和制定再生水水质标准的重要依据.本文研究了手工洗车和龙门式洗车机洗车过程中再生水对典型人群的暴露剂量特征.通过现场调研,确定了洗车现场的典型暴露人群及其暴露时间分布,其中手工洗车工人的清洗耗时和擦车耗时分别平均为4.8 min和8.4 min,龙门式洗车机工人的冲洗浮土耗时、洗车机清洗耗时和擦车耗时分别平均为1.5 min、2.5 min和8.0 min.利用重量法确定了洗车现场空气中的再生水水雾浓度分布(即空气含水量增加值),结果表明手工洗车的水雾浓度为2.0 mg·L-1,洗车机过程中冲洗浮土现场和龙门式洗车机清洗现场的浓度分别为1.3 mg·L-1和3.2 mg·L-1.根据典型暴露人群的呼吸速率,得出再生水的暴露剂量.结果表明,在各种典型人群中,手工洗车清洗工的再生水日暴露剂量最大,高达15.5 mL.d-1. Determination of exposure dose is the premise in pathogen risk assessment of reclaimed water for car wash and an important issue for the establishment of reclaimed water quality standard. The exposure doses of reclaimed water to typical population during manual car wash and mechanical car wash by reciprocating gantry machine were determined in this study. Firstly, the exposure time was measured. The wash time and wiping time of workers during manual car wash were 4.8 min and 8.4 min, respectively. The flushing dust time, mechanical wash time and wiping time during mechanical car wash were 1.5 min, 2.5 min and g. 0 min, respectively. Thereafter, reclaimed water fog concentration at car wash plants was measured by evaluating weight changes of water contents in air. In the manual wash plants, the water fog concentration at washing field was about 2.0 mg·L^-1. In the mechanical wash plants, the water fog concentrations at flushing dust field and reciprocating gantry machine field were 1.3 mg·L^-1and 3.2 mg·L^-1 , respectively. The exposure dose of reclaimed water to workers and car owners were determined based on the exposure time, reclaimed water fog concentration, and respiration rate. The exposure dose of reclaimed water to workers during manual car wash is the highest ( 15.5 mL·d^-1 ) among different populations.
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期844-849,共6页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(No.2008AA062502)~~
关键词 污水再生利用 再生水洗车 呼吸途径 暴露剂量 wastewater reclamation car wash respiratory pathways exposure dose
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Asano T, Leong L Y C, Rigby M G,et al. 1992. Evaluation of theCalifornia wastewater reclamation criteria using enteric virusmonitoring data [ J]. Water Sci Technol, 26 .7/8) : 1513-1524.
  • 2Bauer H , Fuerhacker M , Zibuschka F, et al. 2002. Bacteria and fungiin aerosols generated by two different types of wastewater treatmentplants [J]. Water Res, 36( 16) :3965-3970.
  • 3北京市人民政府.2009.北京市排水和再生水管理办法[OL]. 2009-12- 27. http://www. gov. cn/gzdt/2009- 12/27/content _1497548.htm.
  • 4Fu C Y , Xie X,Huang J J, ef al, 2010. Monitoring and evaluation ofremoval of pathogens at municipal wastewater treatment plants [ J ].Water Sci Technol, 61(6) :1589-1600.
  • 5林毓果,余永惠,付朝辉.2005. GB/T 11605-2005湿度测量方法[S].北京:国家质量监督检验检疫总局.
  • 6何星海,马世豪,李安定,潘小川,陈清,王静芬.再生水利用健康风险暴露评价[J].环境科学,2006,27(9):1912-1915. 被引量:34
  • 7胡洪营,吴乾元,黄晶晶,等.再生水水质安全评价与保障原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
  • 8Huang J J, Hu H Y, Lu S Q , et al. 2012. Monitoring and evaluation ofantibiotic -resistant bacteria at a municipal wastewater treatment plantin China[ J]. Environ Int, 42:31-36.
  • 9Karra S, Katsivela E, 2007. Microorganisms in bioaerosol emissions fromwastewater treatment plants during summer at a Mediterranean site[J]. Water Res, 41(6) :1355-1365.
  • 10李梅,胡洪营,张薛,申欢.城市污水处理工艺对噬菌体的去除效果[J].环境科学,2006,27(1):80-84. 被引量:15

二级参考文献91

共引文献313

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部