期刊文献+

基于S-R-E的时体统一逻辑模型的构建 被引量:10

A Tense-aspect Unified Logical Model Based on S-R-E
原文传递
导出
摘要 时体范畴的功能研究取向在时的形态标记具有类型学差异方面基本达成共识,但在体的类型学差异研究方面仍然不足,体类型具有斯拉夫语和非斯拉夫语的跨语言差异。在时体统一研究观中,时取决于说话时间(S)和参照时间(R)的关系,体则取决于参照时间(R)和事件时间(E)的关系,但由于R和E均具有时点和时段的双重身份,以往研究对S-R-E的逻辑关系刻画缺乏全面性和普适性。形式语义解释模型中的时态算子引入则忽略了S-R-E三者在自然语言中可能存在的任何重叠情况。本文对Reichenbach①和金立鑫的时体理论作进一步修正和拓展,基于时点和时段的互动关系,建立了193种S-R-E逻辑组配模式,并以英语传统语法中的16种时态为例对模型进行了初步检验,同时英语的时体系统也得以建立。 While functional approaches to tense-aspect category have reached agreement on typological tense variation in morphological markers, problems still remain in typological aspect variation. Slavic and non-Slavic languages exhibit different aspect types. It is assumed from tense-aspect unified perspective that tense is determined by the relation of the point of speech(S) to the point of reference( R), while aspect depends on that of the point of reference (R) to the point of event(E). Since either R or E can act as both time-point and time-interval, the depiction of S-R- E logical relations by former researchers fails to arrive at comprehensiveness and universality, and the introduction of tense operators by the formal semantic model neglects any overlaps among S, R and E. This paper attempts to revise and expand the tense-aspect theories by Reichenbach and Jin Lixin and establishes 193 S-R-E logical patterns based on the interaction between time-point and time-interval. The logical model is preliminarily examined with 16 tenses in traditional English grammar, and meanwhile a new English tense-aspect system is also established.
作者 于秀金
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期32-44,共13页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 类型学 时体统一观 时点和时段 S-R—E逻辑模型 英语时体 typology tense-aspect unified perspective time-point & time-interval S-R-E logical model Englishtense-aspect
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Bhat,D. N. S. The Prominence of Tense,Aspectand Mood [ M ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,1999.
  • 2Borik, 0. Aspect and Reference Time [ M ]. U-trecht, Netherlands: Utrecht University, 2002.
  • 3Bybee, J. L. Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-in-flection relations [ A ]. Haiman, J. Iconicity inSyntax [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,1985. 11 -48.
  • 4Bybee, J. L. Markedness: Iconicity, Economy,and Frequency [ A ]. Song, J. J. The OxfordHandbook of Linguistic Typology [ C ]. Oxford :Oxford University Press, 2011. 131 —147.
  • 5Comrie, B. Aspect [ M ]. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1976.
  • 6Comrie,B. Tense [ M ]. Cambridge : CambridgeUniversity Press, 1985.
  • 7Dahl, 0. Tense and Aspect System [ M ]. Bath,UK. : The Bath Press, 1985.
  • 8Dahl, O. Tense-aspect systems of European lan-guages in a typological perspective[ A]. Dahl O.Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [ C].Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. 3 -25.
  • 9Depraetere, I. (A) telicity and intentionality[J]. Linguistics, 2007,(45) : 243 - 269.
  • 10Dowty, D. R. Towards a semantic analysis ofverb aspect and the English imperfective progres-sive [J ]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1977 ,(1): 45 -77.

二级参考文献82

共引文献531

同被引文献108

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部