期刊文献+

An improved GC-ECD method for measuring atmospheric N_2O 被引量:1

An improved GC-ECD method for measuring atmospheric N_2O
原文传递
导出
摘要 Gas chromatography equipped with an electron capture detector (GC-ECD) has been widely used for measuring atmospheric N2O,but nonlinear response and the influence of atmospheric CO2 have been recognized as defects for quantification.An original GCECD method using N 2 as carrier gas was improved by introducing a small flow rate of CO2 makeup gas into the ECD,which could well remedy the above defects.The N2O signal of the improved method was 4-fold higher than that of the original method and the relative standard deviation was reduced from 〉 1% to 0.31%.N2O concentrations with different CO2 concentrations (172.2×10-6-1722×10-6mol/mol) measured by the improved GC-ECD method were in line with the actual N2O concentrations.However,the N2O concentrations detected by the original method were largely biased with a variation range of-4.5%~7%.The N2O fluxes between an agricultural field and the atmosphere measured by the original method were greatly overestimated in comparison with those measured by the improved method.Good linear correlation (R2=0.9996) between the response of the improved ECD and N2O concentrations (93×10-9-1966×10-9mol/mol) indicated that atmospheric N2O could be accurately quantified via a single standard gas.Atmospheric N2O concentrations comparatively measured by the improved method and a high precision GC-ECD method were in good agreement. Gas chromatography equipped with an electron capture detector (GC-ECD) has been widely used for measuring atmospheric N2O,but nonlinear response and the influence of atmospheric CO2 have been recognized as defects for quantification.An original GCECD method using N 2 as carrier gas was improved by introducing a small flow rate of CO2 makeup gas into the ECD,which could well remedy the above defects.The N2O signal of the improved method was 4-fold higher than that of the original method and the relative standard deviation was reduced from 〉 1% to 0.31%.N2O concentrations with different CO2 concentrations (172.2×10-6-1722×10-6mol/mol) measured by the improved GC-ECD method were in line with the actual N2O concentrations.However,the N2O concentrations detected by the original method were largely biased with a variation range of-4.5%~7%.The N2O fluxes between an agricultural field and the atmosphere measured by the original method were greatly overestimated in comparison with those measured by the improved method.Good linear correlation (R2=0.9996) between the response of the improved ECD and N2O concentrations (93×10-9-1966×10-9mol/mol) indicated that atmospheric N2O could be accurately quantified via a single standard gas.Atmospheric N2O concentrations comparatively measured by the improved method and a high precision GC-ECD method were in good agreement.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2013年第3期547-553,共7页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the Special Fund for Environmental Research in the Public Interest(No.201009001) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41075094,21177140 and 40830101) the National Basic Research and the Development Program(973)of China(No.2010CB732304)
关键词 N2O GC-ECD CO2 exchange flux method comparison N2O GC-ECD CO2 exchange flux method comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1刘尔嘉,胡跃新,孙健.利用回归分析研究火焰离子化检测器相对响应值[J].色谱,1994,12(6):414-416. 被引量:4
  • 2Artuso F, Chamard P, Piacentino S, et al. 2007. Atmospheric methane in the Mediterranean: Analysis of measurements at the island of Lampedusa during 1995--2005 [ J ]. Atmospheric Environment, 41 : 3877--3888.
  • 3Daniel J, Solomon S. 1998. On the climate forcing of carbon monoxide [ J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103 ( DI 1 ) : 13249--13260.
  • 4Dones R, Heck T, Hirschberg S. 2004. Greenhouse gas emissions fromenergy systems, comparision and overview [ J ]. Encyclopedia of Energy, 77--95.
  • 5Laurila T. 2009. 14th WMO/IAEA Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Related Tracers Measurement Techniques [ R]. 186. Helsinki, Finland: World Meteorological Organization. 1--2.
  • 6Soares T G, Neto J A, Carvalho J R, et al. 2009. Biomass consumption and CO2, CO and main hydrocarbon gas emissions in an Amazonian forest clearing fire [ J ]. Atmospheric Environment, 43 (2) : 73--78.
  • 7Soussana J F, Allard V, Pilegaard K, et al. 2007. Full accounting of the greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4 ) budget of nine European grassland sites [ J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121 (1-2): 121--134.
  • 8Tsutsumi Y, Mori K, Ikegamt M, et al. 2006. Long-term trends of greenhouse gases in regional and background events observed during 1998- 2004 at Yonagunijima located to the east of the Asian continent [ J]. Atmospheric Environment, 40 : 5868--5879.
  • 9Wang Y S, Wang Y H. 2003. Quick measurement of CH4, CO2 and N2O emissions from a short-plant ecosystem [ J ]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 20(5) : 842--844.
  • 10WMO Greenhouse Gases Bulletin. 2008. The State of Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere Using Global Observations through 2007 [ R]. 4:14. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization, 3.

共引文献30

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部