期刊文献+

应用OPA-K直丝弓矫治器单颌减数治疗安氏Ⅱ~1类错的临床研究

Clinical study of oriental preadjusted appliance-KOSAKA applied in treatment of Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion with single maxillary extraction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价oriental preadjusted appliance-KOSAKA(OPA-K)直丝弓矫治器单颌减数治疗安氏Ⅱ1类错的临床疗效,并探讨其机制和使用方法。方法临床选择17~26岁安氏Ⅱ1类错患者28例,应用OPA-K直丝弓矫治器进行单颌减数治疗,并对治疗前后X线头影测量值的变化进行分析。结果矢状方向上,U1-NA和U1-SN分别减小16.93°和7.06°,U1-NA(mm)减小3.83 mm,U1-L1增加12.94°,L1-NB和L1-MP分别增加2.78°和4.62°,L1-NB(mm)增加1.50 mm,以上差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);而SNA、SNB、ANB的变化均无显著性(P>0.05)。垂直方向上,SN-MP和Y轴的变化均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论应用OPA-K直丝弓矫治器单颌减数治疗安氏Ⅱ1类错可取得令人满意的临床效果。 Objective To evaluate the effects of the oriental preadjusted applianceKOSAKA applied in treatment of monomaxillary Angle class Ⅱdivision 1 malocclusion with single maxillary extraction and discuss the mechanism and application. Methods 28 ca ses at the age of 1726 years old with Angle class Ⅱdivision 1 malocclusion were chosen and treated with the oriental preadjusted ap plianceKOSAKA and with single maxillary extraction. Cephalometric analysis was performed before and after the treatment. Results In the sagittal direction, U1NA and U1SN were reduced by 16.93 °and 7.06°, U1NA(ram) was reduced by 3.83 mm, U1L1 was in creased by 12.94° ,L1NB and L1MP were increased by 2.78° and 4.62°,L1NB(ram) were increased by 1.50 mm,and there were significant differences in these changes (P 〈 0.05 ), but the changes of SNA, SNB, ANB were no significant (P 〉 0.05 ). In the vertical direction, the changes of SNMP and Y axis were not significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions The oriental preadjusted applianceKOSA KA can achieve satifvin clinical effects for treatment of Anzle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion with sine maxillarv extraction.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2013年第2期100-101,107,共3页 Stomatology
基金 黑龙江省教育厅科学技术研究项目资助(12521354)
关键词 OPA-K直丝弓矫治器 安氏Ⅱ1类错[牙合] X线头影测量 oriental preadjusted appliance-KOSAKA Angle classⅡ division 1 malocclusion cephalometric analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

  • 1温秀杰,陈瑶,张勤,罗毅,聂淑媛.成人非拥挤安氏Ⅱ~1错单颌拔牙矫治X线头影测量分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2007,23(3):173-175. 被引量:4
  • 2傅民魁.口腔正畸学.5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:219-231.
  • 3Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, et al. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995,107 ( 1 ) :28-37.
  • 4Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic di- agnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1946,32 : 175-230.
  • 5Bohon WA. Disharmomy in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod, 1958,28 ( 2 ) : 113- 130.
  • 6Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod, 1962,48 (7) :504-529.
  • 7曾龙祥.安氏Ⅱ类错殆的诊断与治疗原则//爱丁堡皇家外科学院口腔正畸专业考试病例精选.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2007:100.
  • 8陈扬熙 张德福.哈尔滨市100名正常(牙合)儿童侧貌的X线头影测量研究[J].中华口腔科杂志,1985,20(1):45-48.
  • 9Ciger S,Aksu M,Germec D.Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class Ⅱ Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment:cephalometric and model analysis[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2005,127(2):219-223.
  • 10Hayasaki SM,Caszanha Henriques JF,Janson G,et al.Influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in Japanese-Brazilians with class Ⅰ and class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,127(1):30-36.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部