期刊文献+

Isobar TTL内固定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效 被引量:5

Effectiveness of Isobar TTL system in treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估Isobar TTL内固定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2007年11月一2010年12月应用Isobar’In内固定系统治疗并获得随访的18例腰椎退行性疾病的临床资料。结果18例获随访15~52个月.平均35个月。ODI术前评分为(24.00±10.52)分,末次随访时为(6.94±5.53)分(P〈O.001);VAS评分术前为(7.89±0.90)分,末次随访时为(1.11±1.08)分(P〈0.001);JOA评分术前为(7.33±5.18)分,末次随访时为(23.17±3.15)分(P〈0.001)。动态固定节段椎间隙高度术前为(11.48±1.70)mm,末次随访时为(10.85±1.32)mm(P〉0.05);椎间孑L高度术前为(20.95±3.12)mm,末次随访时为(21.86±2.23)ram(P〉O.05);ROM术前为(3.71±2.24)。,末次随访时为(2.72±1.90)。(P〉0.05)。结论应用IsobarrrL内固定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病I临床疗效满意,融合节段均顺利获得融合,动态固定节段得到有效保护。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of Isobar TTLsystem in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods Between November 2007 and December 2010, 18 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar diseases were treated by decompression combined with Isobar TYL system and followed up. Results All patients were followed up for an average of 35 months (range, 15-52 months). Preoperative ODI was (24.00±10.52), and the postoperative ODI was (6.94+ 5.53)(P 〈0.001). VAS score was reduced from (7.89±0.90) preoperatively to (1.11±1.08) postoperatively (P 〈0.001). The JOA score was improved remarkably from (7.33±5.18) preoperatively to (23.17±3.15) postoperatively(P 〈0.001). The intervertebral space height was slightly decreased from (11.48±1.70)mm preoperatively to (10.85±1.32)mm postoperatively(P 〉0.05), and the foraminal height was changed a little from (20.95±3.12)mm to (21.86±2.23)mm(P 〉0.05). The ROM was also not obvious from (3.71±2.24) preoperatively to (2.72±1.90). postoperatively (P 〉0.05). Conclusion The Isobar TrL system shows the clinical benefits. And it minimizes accelerated degeneration at protected levels, which appears to be a useful and effective manner for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2013年第3期222-224,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 ISOBAR TTL内固定 腰椎退行性疾病 非融合内固定 Isobar TTL system Degenerative lumbar diseases Non-fusion internal fLxation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kumar A,Beastall J,Hughes J,et al. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years[J]. Spine,2008,33(26) :2909-2914.
  • 2徐西强,李峰,吴华.棘突间动态稳定系统(Wallis)在腰椎退变性疾病中的临床应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(1):18-19. 被引量:7
  • 3Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR. Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative dis- eases of the lumbar spine[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech ,2009,22(5): 376- 383.
  • 4Fairbank J,Couper J,Davies J,et al. The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire[J]. Physiotherapy, 1980,66($) :271-273.
  • 5Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Associ- ation Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy,evaluation of the clinicttl outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association[J]. J Or- thop $ci, 2008,13(1) : 25-31.
  • 6Yonenobu K,Okada K,Fuji T,et al. Cause of neum-logie deteriora- tion following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy [J]. Spine, 1986,1 h 818-823.
  • 7Yang JY ,Lee JK,Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degener- ation on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion [J]. Spine, 2008,33(5) : 503-507.
  • 8Cinotti G, De Santis P, Nofroni I, et al. Stenosis of lumbar interverte- bral foramen:anatomic study on predisposing factors [J]. Spine, 2002,27(3) : 223-229.
  • 9李忠海,王诗媛,付强,马辉,唐昊,张秋林.腰椎退行性疾病ISOBAR动态固定早期临床观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(11):973-976. 被引量:12
  • 10Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR. Posterior pediele f,ation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative dis- eases of the lumbar spine [.J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(5): 376-383.

二级参考文献18

  • 1谢荣,李展振,刘志安,李艳兵,戈才华,邱优国.腰椎融合术对相邻椎间盘退变影响的临床分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(4):289-290. 被引量:10
  • 2毛路,刘栋,郝剑,沈忆新.腰椎动力固定装置治疗下腰痛的研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(3):262-264. 被引量:8
  • 3Cheh G, Bfidwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment diseasefollowing lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine, 2007,32: 2253 -2257.
  • 4Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, instrumentation versus treatment of adolescent degrees. Spine, 2006, 31: Kim YJ, et al. Anterior/posterior spinal posterior instrumentation alone for the idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 2386-2391.
  • 5Schnake K J, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine, 2006, 31:442-449.
  • 6Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AlL Posterior pedide fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22:376-383.
  • 7Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Neurol India, 2005, 53:466-474.
  • 8Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the copenhagen osteoarthritis study. Spine, 2007, 32:120-125.
  • 9Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, et al. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003. 16:418-423.
  • 10Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, et al. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Spine, 2008, 33:2909-2914.

共引文献14

同被引文献47

  • 1胡勇,杨述华,谢辉,徐荣明,马维虎.Quantitative anatomic study of atlanto-odontoid joint and design of an artificial atlanto-odontoid joint for the orthopedic clinic[J].Chinese Journal of Traumatology,2007,10(3):138-144. 被引量:12
  • 2Xia XP, Chen HL, Cheng HB. Prevalence of adjacent segmentdegeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Spinet Phila Pa 1976) , 2013 , 38(7) :597-608.
  • 3Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, et al. Adjacent segmentdisease in the lumbar spine following different treatmentinterventions[ J]. Spine J,2013 , 13(10) : 1339-1349.
  • 4Ren C, Song Y, Liu L, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration anddisease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preservingprocedures: a meta-analysis [ J] . Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(Suppl 1) :S245-253.
  • 5Heo Y, Park JH, Seong HY, et al. Symptomatic adjacentsegment degeneration at the L3-4 level after fusion surgery at theL4-5 level : evaluation of the risk factors and 10-year incidence[J] . Eur Spine J,2015,13 [ Epub ahead of print].
  • 6Yu CH, Lee JE, Yang JJ, et al. Adjacent Segment Degenerationafter Single-Level PLIF : Comparison between SpondylolyticSpondylolisthesis, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and SpinalStenosis[ J]. Asian Spine J, 2011,5(2) :82-90.
  • 7Anandjiwala J, Seo JY, Ha KY, et al. Adjacent segmentdegeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion : aprospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up[ J].Eur Spine J’ 2011, 20( 11) :1951-1960.
  • 8Shin DA, Yi S,Yoon DH, et al. Artificial disc replacementcombined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-leveldisc disease [J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) , 2009, 34 ( 11 ):1153-1159.
  • 9Lazaro BC, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, et al. Biomeohanics ofdynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness withlumbosacral fusion[ J ]. Neurosurgery, 2013 , 73 (3 ) :517-527.
  • 10Cabello J, Cavanilles-Walker JM , Iborra M, et al. The protectiverole of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigidinstrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis[ J J. ArchOrthop Trauma Surg, 2013 , 133(4) ;443-448.

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部