摘要
构想效度是心理测量中最重要的概念,也是一直悬而未决的概念。在构想效度提出60多年后,本文在前人的研究基础上,再次探讨构想效度的本质及其定律网络问题。我们分析认为,构想效度的提出是为了解答"心理测验究竟测量了什么"这个核心问题,试图结束心理测量界长期使用"缺少明确定义的测量"的局面。在这一目标的重压下,Cronbach和Meehl受到逻辑实证主义的影响,创立定律网络来证明心理构想理论的成立。该网络的提出本质上强调了心理构想的外在客观实体以及建立定律的重要性。只有证明心理构想的客观存在,以及心理构想与实体的定律关系,才能实现对"测量了什么"的证明,这一研究思路完全遵循科学理论的研究范式,也是当前构想效度研究应继续遵循的道路。
Construct Validity is of the most important concepts in psychological measurement.This concept is still an unsettled problem. After 60 years, based on the previous studies, We explore the nature of the construct validity and its Nomological Network again, Our analysis showed that Cronbach and Meehl received the impact of logical positivism. They founded Nomolgical Network to prove the theory of construct validity. Nomolgical Network essentially emphasized the external objective entities of construct and laws. This research ideas are in full compliance with the research paradigm ＇of scientific theory, Current construct validity studies should continue to follow ihe research direction.
出处
《中国考试》
2013年第3期16-22,共7页
journal of China Examinations
关键词
构想效度
逻辑实证主义
定律网络
Construct Validity
Logical Positivism
Nomological Network
