期刊文献+

试测在高考命题试题难度调控中的实践研究 被引量:4

Practice and Research of Trial Testing for Test Difficulty Rate Controlling in National College Entrance Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在现实条件下,高考的难度仍然受到广泛关注,科学调控试题难度是高考命题过程中的一个重要环节。通过设定标准选择当年参加高考的少量学生入闱进行试测,运用等百分位等值、平均值等值和加权分析等方法,结合对试测生实测数据的分析,能够达到预测试卷难度的效果。试卷难度的有效预测对科学调控试题难度起到了很好的作用。 In the current situation, the National College Entrance Examination is still widely concerned. Controlling the test difficulty rate scientifically is an important step in the process of the test writing. Through setting the standard, some students are selected to have trial testing in the test-writing site. Then the data are analyzed by means of equipercentile Equating, mean Equating, weighing analysis and so on. The valid prediction of the test difficulty rate plays an important role in the process of controlling the difficulty.
作者 李瑛
出处 《中国考试》 2013年第3期23-30,共8页 journal of China Examinations
基金 湖南省教育考试院教育科学考试科研项目(XJKK10A120)的资助
关键词 试测 试题难度 预测 调控 Trial Testing Test Difficulty Rate Prediction Controlling
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献10

  • 1Brennan, R. L. ( Ed ), Educational Measurement, 4^th ed, Westport, CT : Praeger Publishers,2006.
  • 2Crocker, L. , & Algina, J. , Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group, 1956.
  • 3Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M. ,& Holland, P. ,W., Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales, Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York : Springer,2007.
  • 4Hambleton, R. , Swaminathan, H. , & Rogers, H. , Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Newberry Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
  • 5Kolen, M. J. , & Brennan, R. L. , Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices, 2^nd ed. , NewYork, NY : Springer,2004.
  • 6Ryan, J., & Brockmann, F, A Practitioner's Introductions to Equating with Primers on Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory, Washing, DC:Council of Chief State School Officers, 2009.
  • 7Ryan, J. ,A Practitioners' Introduction to Equating and Linking with a Primer on Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory : Major Concepts and Basic Terms, Examination Research ,2011 ( 1 ) :80 - 94.
  • 8Sinharay, S. , & Holland, P. , Is h Necessary to Make Anchor Tests Mini-Versions of the Tests Being Equated or Can Some Restrictions Be Relaxed? Journal of Educational Measurement ,2007 (44) :249 - 275.
  • 9Von Davier,A. A. , Holland,P. W. ,& Thayer, D. T, The Kernel Method of Test Equating, New York : Springer,2004.
  • 10Livingston, S. A. Equating Test Scores (Without IRT). Princeton, N J: Educational Testing Service. 2004.

共引文献12

同被引文献45

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部