基于技术创新的企业社会责任对绩效影响研究被引量：57

The influence of corporate social responsibility basing on technological innovation on financial performance: an empirical research

原文传递

导出

摘要以公共事件为切入点,从绿色创新角度出发,将从基于技术创新的企业社会责任对企业财务绩效影响这条意识的路径来研究,而不是基于社会责任的创新对企业财务绩效的影响。从大量文献研究发现,创新的绿色也就是基于技术创新的社会责任,我们将剖析基于技术创新尤其是产品和工艺创新的企业社会责任对于企业社会绩效和财务绩效的影响机制和媒体曝光度在这种影响机制中所起到的调节作用。研究认为,基于技术创新的企业社会责任会积极影响企业社会绩效,社会绩效会积极影响企业财务绩效,而媒体曝光度则会正向调节基于技术创新的企业社会责任对社会绩效影响机制。 In this paper, public events as the starting point, we analye the influence of corporate social responsibility basing on product and process innovation on corporate social performance and financial performance, and the role of media influence in the impact mecha- nism. We suggest that, corporate social responsibility basing on technological innovation affects the financial performance. Corporate social responsibility basing on product and process innovation will affect corporate social performance, that this effect may be moderated positively by media, corporate social performance will positively impact corporate financial performance.

作者付强刘益

机构地区上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期463-468,共6页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172128)

关键词企业社会责任技术创新财务绩效 corporate social responsibility technological innovation financial performance

分类号 C931 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1Alexander G J, Buchholz R A. Corporate social respon- sibility and stock market performance [ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21:479-486.
2Berman S L, Wicks A C, Kotha S, Jones T M. Does stakeholder orientation matter? the reltionship between stakeholder management models and firm financial per- formance[ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42 : 488 - 506.
3Carroll A B. A three -dimensional model of corporate social performance [ J ]. Academy of Management Re- view, 1987, 4:497-505.
4Chen C. Design for environment : a quality - based mod- el for green product development[ J]. Management Sci- ence, 2001, 47(2) : 250 -263.
5Davis K. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995. 16:312-322.
6Drht M E. Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental buying as a noneconomic buying cnleiion [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58 (3): 1-19.
7Frooman J. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth[J].Business & Society, 1997. 36:221 -249.
8Haley E. Exploring the construct of organization as source: consumers " understandings of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising [ J ]. Journal of Ad- vertising, 1996, 25 (Summer): 19-35.
9Jones T M. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics [ J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995. 20:404-437.
10Margolis J D, Walsh J P. People and Profits: The Search for a Link Between a Company' s Social and Fi- nancial Performance[ M]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum Associates. 2001. 210-226.