期刊文献+

康梁并称的缘起与流变 被引量:6

How Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao Came to Be Referred to As "Kang-Liang"
原文传递
导出
摘要 在众多康门弟子中,唯独梁启超与乃师并称,就此而言,看似师弟二人始终一体同心,实则双方常常貌合神离。合称既非事主的自愿,亦非同门的口碑,此一称谓,戊戌由湖南旧派士绅攻诋发其端,湘中及沪上新党庚其续,庚子前后清廷通缉张其名,癸卯革党与保皇会的论战坐其实。对此,当事双方均不以为然。坊间从俗,尚无大碍,学界因循,则距事实真相渐行渐远。 Among Kang Youwei's many students,only Liang Qichao is mentioned in the same breath as his teacher.To all appearances,teacher and student were all along united and of one mind,but in reality they were always essentially at variance.The conflation of their identities in the term 'Kang-Liang' was not the intention of the principals,nor was the term used by Kang's followers.The term originated in printed attacks from the old gentry in Hunan province in 1898,and was taken up by New Party members in Hunan and Shanghai.The term spread widely when the Qing court designated Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao as wanted criminals around 1900,and became firmly established during the debates between the revolutionary party and the royalist party.Both Kang and Liang disagreed with these developments.It does little damage if the general public continues to use this term,but if scholars do not reconsider their usage they will stray further and further from the truth.
作者 桑兵
机构地区 中山大学历史系
出处 《近代史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期46-64,共19页 Modern Chinese History Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1吾庐主人梭功氏.《序》,小配.《大马扁》,日本三光堂1909年版,第1-2页.
  • 2陈天华.《复湖南同学诸君书》,《苏报》,1903年6月14日,第1-2页.
  • 3《读中外日报》,《苏报》,1903年5月18日,第2页.
  • 4孙中山.《复某友人函》,中国社会科学院近代史研究所中华民国史研究室等编.《孙中山全集》第l卷,中华书局1981年版,第229-230页.
  • 5孙中山.《敬告同乡书》、《驳保皇报书》,《剥、中山全集》第1卷,第230-232页.
  • 6《奏设检书处议》,何良栋辑.《皇朝经世文编四编》第6卷,沈云龙主编.《近代中国史料丛刊》(761),台北,文海出版社1966年版,第122-124页.
  • 7《密札防匪》,《申报》,1903年7月1日,第3版.
  • 8《南京各学堂之压制政策》,《国民日日报》,1903年8月10日,第7版.
  • 9季子(陈去病).《革命其可免乎》,《江苏》,1903年6月25日,“社说”,第2页.
  • 10《叶吏部与刘先端黄郁文两生书》,《近代文献丛刊·翼教丛编》,第165页.

共引文献6

引证文献6

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部