期刊文献+

中国英语专业学生英语议论文句法复杂性研究 被引量:44

A study on the syntactic complexity of English essays written by Chinese students of English
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究对比分析中国英语专业学生与英语本族语者在议论文中句法复杂性的差异。指标有单位长度(W/T和W/C)、单位密度(C/T和DC/C)、四类句子、从句、紧缩子句和限定与非限定动词的被动形式。结果表明,中国英语专业学生的单位长度和密度与语言能力变化方向一致。长度指标显著低于本族语者,密度在多数情况下也显著偏小。简单句在4年级和写作高分组下降显著,状语、宾语和表语从句随年级的升高只呈下降趋势。中国学生对上述句型的使用显著多于本族语者。紧缩子句和被动句只在写作高分组中显著增多,但低于本族语者。 This paper reports the differences in syntactic complexity between essays written by Chinese students of English and by native English speakers.'Syntactic complexity' includes the length of T units(W/T) and clauses(W/C),embeddedness — the ratios of clauses to T units(C/T) and of dependent clauses to clauses(DC/C),and syntactic structures covering independent and dependent clauses,passives and reduced structures.The results reveal that the length and embeddedness indexes increase in line with their English proficiency.Compared with native speakers,the length indexes demonstrated by the Chinese students are significantly lower and the embeddedness indexes show a similar tendency in most cases.The use of adverbial,object and complement clauses shows an insignificant decline as the Chinese students go from their first year to later years,while the number of simple sentences shows a significant drop in year 4 and among better student writers,but is significantly higher than that of native speakers.There is a significant rise in the use of passives and reduced structures in the high-score group,but it is significantly lower than that of the native speakers.
机构地区 西南交通大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期264-275,320,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 夏伟蓉主持的国家社科基金一般项目"我国大学生英语句法能力与句法多样性的相关研究"(09BYY065) 徐晓燕主持的教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"单位长度 单位密度和句式类型--对我国英语学习者英语句法复杂性的研究"(10YJA740108)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Beers, S. & W. Naggy. 2009. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing qual- ity: Which measures? Which genre? [J]. Read Writing 22: 185-200.
  • 2Biber, D., B. Gray & K. Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? [J]. TESOL Quarterly 45.. 5-35.
  • 3Cooper, T. 1976. Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of Ger- man [J]. The Journal of Educational Research 69: 176-183.
  • 4Crowhurst, M. 1980. Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels [J]. Canadian Journal of Education 5: 6-13.
  • 5Gaise, S. 1976. Sentence-combining: A technique for assessing proficiency in a second lan- guage [R]. Paper presented at the Conference on Perspectives on Language, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, May 1976.
  • 6Gebhard,A. 1978. Writing quality and syntax: A transformational analysis of three prose samples [J]. Research in the Teaching of English 12: 211-231.
  • 7Halliday, M. 2004. The Language of Science [M]. London: Continuum.
  • 8Kameen, P. 1979. Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality [A]. In C. Yorio, K. Perkins & J. Schachter (eds.). On TESOL '79 : The Learner in Focus [C]. Washington, DC: TE- SOL. 343-364.
  • 9Kawata, K. 1992. Evaluation of free English composition [J]. CASELE Research Bulletin 22.. 49-53.
  • 10Larsen-Freeman, D. 1978. An ESL index of development [J]. TESOL Quarterly 12: 439-448.

二级参考文献89

共引文献478

同被引文献316

引证文献44

二级引证文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部