期刊文献+

我国区域R&D投入绩效评价研究——基于三大执行主体的视角

The Research on Performance Evaluation of Regional R&D Input in China mBased on the Three Main Executive Bodies of R&D
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据R&D活动包括三大执行主体,本文将区域R&D活动分解为高校、企业和科研机构三个子过程,通过构建并形结构的关联网络DEA模型对我国区域R&D投入绩效进行较全面的评价。结果表明:我国区域R&D投入的整体效率和三个执行主体的予过程效率都普遍偏低,存在明显的区域差异;高校的R&D活动效率是三大执行主体中最高的;企业R&D活动效率与区域效率具有高度一致性,而科研机构R&D活动效率的过分低效导致了我国区域R&D投入绩效普遍偏低;东、中、西部三大地区的R&D活动效率呈现明显的“阶梯分布”现象。 As R&D activities comprise three main parts, regional R&D activities are classified into higher educational institutions, enterpri- ses and scientific research organizations in this paper. A relational network DEA model that has parallel structure is developed. With this model, the China's regional R&D input performance is evaluated comprehensively. The results indicate that the overall regional R&D input efficiency, as well as the efficiency of three sub-processes, in China is poor, and that there exists significant regional differences. R&D ef- ficiency of higher educational institutions is the highest among the three. R&D efficiency of the enterprises and the overall efficiency of re- gions are very similar, and the main reason for the low efficiency of the China's regional R&D input performance is that the scientific re- search organizations are inefficient. In addition, R&D efficiency of the east, central and west regions presents in a ladder-type distribution.
作者 尹伟华
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期185-190,共6页 Journal of Intelligence
基金 安徽省高校优秀青年基金项目“安徽省产业集聚与区域经济发展互动研究”(编号:2011SQRW048) 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“基于网络分析视角下的我国区域R&D投入绩效评价研究”(编号:12XNHl57) 安徽财经大学校级重点科研项目“安徽省产业聚集与区域经济发展的互动研究--基于泛长三角产业转移发展环境”(编号:ACKYQllllZD).
关键词 Rdd3投入绩效评价并形结构关联网络DEA R&D Input performance evaluation parallel structure relational network DEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Zhang A,Zhang Y,Zhao R.A Study of the R&D Efficiency and Productivity of Chinese Firms[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,2003(31):444-464.
  • 2Wang E C.R&D Efficiency and Economic Performance:A Cross-country Analysis using the Stochastic Frontier Approach[J].Policy Modeling,2007,29(2):345-60.
  • 3岳书敬.中国区域研发效率差异及其影响因素——基于省级区域面板数据的经验研究[J].科研管理,2008,29(5):173-179. 被引量:132
  • 4刘和东.中国区域研发效率及其影响因素研究——基于随机前沿函数的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(4):548-556. 被引量:121
  • 5Korhonen P,Tainio R,Wallenius J.Value Efficiency Analysis of Academic Research[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001(130):121-132.
  • 6Cherchye L,Vanden P,Abeele.On Research Efficiency:a Micro-analysis of Dutch University Research in Economic and Business Management[J].Research Policy,2005(34):495-516.
  • 7Sena V.Total factor Productivity and the Spillover Hypothesis:Some New Evidence[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2004,7(1):31-40.
  • 8Gaimon C,Morton A.Investment in Facility Changeover Flexibility for Early into High-tech Markets[J].Production and Operations Management,2005,14(2):159-174.
  • 9Lee H,Park Y.An International Comparison of R&D Efficiency:DEA Approach[J].Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,2005,13(2):207-221.
  • 10Wang E C,Huang W.Relative Efficiency of R&D Activities:A Cross-country Study Accounting for Environmental Factors in the DEA approach[J].Research Policy,2006(11):14-28.

二级参考文献58

共引文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部