期刊文献+

学习障碍儿童的家庭环境与自我意识和个性特征 被引量:3

Relevance between Family Environment,Self-concept and Personality in Children with Learning Disorders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨学习障碍儿童的家庭环境与自我意识和个性特征的相关性。方法采用对照研究,对安宁市某小学3~6年级的儿童进行整群抽样筛查。采用学习障碍筛查量表和多重成就测验成绩筛出学习障碍儿童158名作为研究对象,并随机选取与学习障碍儿童同年龄、同性别、同班级的非学习障碍儿童158名为对照组。采用家庭环境量表中文版(FES-CV)、Piers-Harris儿童自我意识量表和艾森克人格问卷对两组儿童进行测评。结果研究组儿童家庭环境量表中的亲密感、情感表达、成功性、文化性、娱乐性、组织性因子分低于对照组(U=9.749,5.302,10.033,8.384,6.999,13.407;P<0.05),而矛盾性因子分则高于对照组(U=5.43,P<0.05);在Piers-Harris儿童自我意识量表中,学习障碍组儿童的总分和因子分均低于对照组(U=12.535,12.018,9.251,3.469,12.058,9.358,9757,P<0.05);在艾森克个性问卷中,学习障碍组儿童的精神质和神经质得分高于对照组(U=4.356,3.193;P<0.05),外向性得分低于对照组(U=3.251,P<0.05)。FES-CV的某些环境因素与学习障碍组儿童的自我意识和个性特征相关。结论学习障碍儿童的家庭环境不良,其自我意识水平较低,家庭环境与其自我意识和个性有关。 Objective To explore the relevance between family environment ,self-concept and personality in children with learn- ing disorders(LD). Methods The study adopted controlled design. 158 children from grade 3 to 6 of a primary school in city of Anning were assessed as LD with the Pupil Rating Scale Revised-Screening for Learning Disability (PRS)and Multiple Achievement Tests (MATs). 158 children were taken as control group respectively from the normal children who were matched in sex ,age ,grade and class with LD children randomly. Children of two groups were tested by the Family Environment Scale--Chinese Version(F~ -- CV),Children's self-concept Scale(PHCSS)and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ). Results In FES--CV,the facto^r scores of cohesion ,expressiveness ,achievement orientation ,intellectual-cultural orientation ,active-recreational orientation and orga- nization in children with LD were lower (U= 9. 749,5. 302,10. 033,8. 384,6. 999,13. 407 ~P^0.05) ,but the conflict factor score was higher than that in control group(U= 5.43,P%0.05). Compared the PHCSS between the two groups,the total score and all dimension scores of LD group were lower than those of control group(U: 12. 535,12. 018,9. 251,3. 469,12. 058,9. 358,9757 ;P% 0.05 ). In EPQ,the factor scores of psychoticism and neuroticism LD group were higher than those of control group (U = 4. 356, 3. 193;P%0.05),but the extraversion factor score was lower than control group(U= 3. 251 ,P,0.05). Some family environment factors of children with LD were correlated with children's self-concept and personality. Conclusion Family environment of chil- dren with LD is not good. Children with LD have lower self-concept. Family environment of children with LD have close relation with their self-concept and personality.
作者 唐岩 张轶杰
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第3期417-419,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 学习障碍 儿童 家庭环境 自我意识 个性 Learning disorders Children Family environment Self-concept Personality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lagae L. Learning disabilities : Definitions, epidemiology, diagnosis, and intervention strategies [J ]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2008, 55 (6):1259-1268.
  • 2Bauminger N,Edelsztein H S, Morash J. Social information process- ng and emotional understanding in children with LD [J]. J Learn Disabil, 2005,38 (1) : 45-61.
  • 3Knivsberg A M, Andreessen A B. Behavior, attention and cognition in severe dyslexia [-J ]. Nord J Psychiatry, 2008,62 ( 1 ) : 59- 65.
  • 4Geary D C, Hoard M K, Byrd - Craven J, et ah Cognitive mecha- nisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability [-J]. Child Dev, 2007,78(4) : 1343-1359.
  • 5Rashid F L, Morris R D, Sevcik R A. Relationship between home lit- eracy environment and reading a.chievement in children with reading disabilities [-J ]. J Learn Dis, 2005,38 ( 1 ) : 2-11.
  • 6Wessman A E. Personality and subjective experience of time[J]. J Pets Assess,1973,37 (2) : 103-104.
  • 7范肖冬 汪向东 于欣 译.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.197.
  • 8Myktebust H R. The pupil rating scale revised [M]. New York: Grune and Strotton, 1981 : 12.
  • 9范晓玲,龚耀先.4~6年级多重成就测验的编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(3):253-257. 被引量:22
  • 10龚耀先,蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表(C-wISC)[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993.

二级参考文献16

  • 1郭靖,龚耀先.小学生(四—六年级)学习能力倾向测验的初步编制:编制策略、条目分析和信度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(2):127-130. 被引量:4
  • 2Richard Lynn,Paul Irwing. Sex differences in general knowledge,semantic memory and reasoning ability. British Journal of Psychology ,2002,93(4):545-557.
  • 3John J. McArdle,Fumiaki Hamagmi,william Meredith,Katherine P. Bradway. Modeling the dynamic Hypotheses of Gf-Gc theory using Iongitudinal life-span data.Learning and Individual Differences,2000, (12):53-79.
  • 4Phillip L. Ackerman,Margaret E.Beier,Kristy R Bowen.Explorations of crystallized intelligence Completion tests,cloze tests,and knowledge.Learning and Individual Differences, 2000,(12):105-121.
  • 5Cott G, Jodie L, Julianne C: Developing Disllusionment:Students' Perceptions of Achievement Test. Issues in Education, 2000,6(1/2):29-30.
  • 6Bell, Paul F, Lentz Jr, Francis E. Effects of curriculumtest overlap on standardized achievement test scores:Identifying systematic confounds in educational decision making. School Psychology Review, 1992, 21(4):644-656.
  • 7Whitehead, Bruce, Santee, Phillip. Using standardized test results as an instructional guide. Clearing House, 1994, 67(6):317-319.
  • 8Lazar Stankov. The theory of fliud and crystallized intelligence. Learning & Individual Difference, 2000(1):1-3.
  • 9Ian Stuart-Hamilton,Patrick Rabbitt. Age-related decline in spelling:a link with fluid intelligence? Educational Gerontology, 1997, 23(5):437-441.
  • 10Lou M. Carey. Measuring and Evaluating School Learning.ALLYN and BACON, 1994, (2):220-222.

共引文献3061

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部