期刊文献+

西方全纳教育效果的研究分析与启示 被引量:27

An Analysis of the Western Research into the Effect of Inclusive Education and Its Enlightenment on Chinese Special Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要从特殊儿童的学业发展、社会性发展以及家长和普通教师对全纳教育的态度等方面分析了西方学者关于全纳教育效果的研究,并在此基础上对我国的特殊教育发展进行了思考。文章认为我国的特殊教育发展应该努力发展与随班就读相配合的资源教室,要加强我国不同教育模式效果的实证研究,在发展特殊教育的过程中要积极借鉴西方全纳教育发展的经验并吸取教训。 This study aims to analyze Western academic research into the effects of inclusive education in terms of disabled children's academic and social development, and the attitudes of disabled children's parents and teachers towards inclusive education, and based on this, to give reflections on the development of special education in China. According to the study, special education in China needs to develop resource classrooms in coordination with inclusive education, strengthen evidence-based research into the effects of various modes of education, and use for reference Western experience in developing inclusive education.
作者 颜廷睿 邓猛
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期3-7,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
关键词 全纳教育 效果分析 学业发展 社会性发展 态度 inclusive education effect analysis academic development social development attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Stainback W, Stainback S. A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, i984,51(2) :102 - 111.
  • 2邓猛,潘剑芳.关于全纳教育思想的几点理论回顾及其对我们的启示[J].中国特殊教育,2003(4):1-7. 被引量:115
  • 3熊絮茸,邓猛.融合教育的宽容脉络及其现代性发展[J].继续教育研究,2011(12):8-11. 被引量:4
  • 4Lindsay,.Geoff. Inclusive education: a critical per- spective. British Joumal of Special Education, 2003,30 (1) :3 - 12.
  • 5Nancy M. Despite Best Intention" When Inclusion Fails. The Journal of Special Education, 1999,33(1):36- 49.
  • 6Baker J, Zigmond N. Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabil- ities? Exceptional Children, 1999,56 (6) :515 - 526.
  • 7Senunel M, Manset G. Are inclusive programs for stu- dents with mild disabilities effective? The Journal of Special Education, 1997,31(2) : 155 - 180.
  • 8Farrell M. Debating special education, london: Rout- ledge, 2010.110 17 Kavale K A, Forness S R. History, rhetoric, and reality: analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 2000,21 (5) : 279 - 297.
  • 9Kavale K A, Fomess S R. History, rhetoric, and reality: analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 2000,21 (5) : 279 - 297.
  • 10HalahanPD,KauffmanMJ,Pullen.肖非等译.特殊教育导论(第十一版).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.50.

二级参考文献102

共引文献264

同被引文献307

引证文献27

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部