期刊文献+

我国产业结构演变趋势及其减排潜力分析 被引量:35

Projection of Industrial Structure Evolution and Its Carbon Abatement Potential for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文首先比较了我国与美国、欧盟、日本在部门能源强度和产业结构上的差距,进而利用Markov模型对未来我国产业结构进行预测,在此基础上分析了我国未来能源强度的走势以及产业结构演变对降低能源强度的贡献。比较发现,我国各部门能源强度显著高于美国、欧盟和日本,且第一和第二产业比重过高和第三产业过低的产业结构均造成我国碳排放居高的现状。与美欧日相比,我国降低能源强度的减排潜力分别为24%、60%和53%;产业结构演变的减排潜力分别为40%、32%和28%。未来我国第一产业比重将持续下降近4个百分点,第二产业比重小幅下调1.5个百分点,第三产业比重明显上升5.3个百分点。但是各产业比重变动幅度到后期变慢,趋于稳定,产业结构演变对能源强度贡献越来越小。2020年和2030年我国能源强度将比2007年分别降低52.2%和68.9%,相应产业结构演变的贡献度从15.44%下降到7.86%。 This paper firstly compared the energy intensity of economic sectors and industrial structures among China, U- nited States, European Union and Japan. And then we projected the evolution of industrial structure, based on which the future trajectory of energy intensity of China is analyzed, as well with the contribution of industrial structure evolution on the decrease of energy intensity. By comparison, we found the energy intensity of almost all sectors is significantly higher than that of US, EU and Japan, which in conjunction with the overweighted shares of primary and secondary industry caused the high carbon emission of China. The abatement potential are 24% ,60% and 53% by dropping the sectoral energy intensity of China to the level of US,EU and Japan; while they are 40% ,32% and 28% if the industrial struc- ture of China is the same as that of US, EU and Japan. Our projection on industrial structure evolution indicated that theshare of primary industry will continue to decrease by nearly 4 percentage point through 2030,relative to that of 2010; the share of secondary industry will adjust downward by 1.5 percentage point and that of tertiary industry will rise by 5.3 percentage point simultaneously. However, the step of evolution tends to be slowing down and the whole process of evolu- tion is stabilizing. Consequently,the energy intensity of the society at large will decline by 52. 2% and 68.9% by 2020 and 2030 compared to the level of 2007 ; and the contribution of industrial structure evolution drops from 15.44% to 7. 86%.
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期35-42,共8页 China Soft Science
基金 中国国家基础研究项目(973项目 2012CB955804) 国家自然科学基金项目(41201594) 中国科学院战略性先导科技专项--应对气候变化的碳收支认证及相关问题(XDA05150502)资助
关键词 产业结构预测 国际比较 能源强度 减排潜力 MARKOV模型 industrial structure evolution international comparison energy intensity abatement potential Markov model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Steckel J,Jakob M, Marschinski R, Luderer G. From Car- bonization to Decarbonization? Past Trends and Future Scenari- os for China' s COs Emissions [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2011,39 (6) : 3443 -3455.
  • 2Zhang Z X. Decoupling China's Carbon Emissions In- crease from Economic Growth: An Economic Analysis and Policy Implications [ J ]. World Development, 2000,28 ( 4 ) : 739 - 752.
  • 3Wang C, Chen J, Zou J. Decomposition of Energy - Rela- tedCO2 Emission in China: 1957 - 2000[J]. Energy,2005, 30 (1): 73 -83.
  • 4Zhang M, Mu H, Ning Y, Song Y. Decomposition of Energy -Related CO2 Emission Over 1991 -2006 in China [ J]. Ecological Economics ,2009,68 (7) : 2122 - 2128.
  • 5Hu C Z, Huang X J. Characteristics of Carbon Emission in China and Analysis on Its Cause [ J ]. China Population, Re- sources and Environment,2008,18(3) : 38 -42.
  • 6张雷,黄园淅.中国产业结构节能潜力分析[J].中国软科学,2008(5):27-34. 被引量:36
  • 7刘卫东,张雷,王礼茂,赵建安,马丽,唐志鹏,高菠阳,余金艳.我国低碳经济发展框架初步研究[J].地理研究,2010,29(5):778-788. 被引量:59
  • 8蔡圣华,牟敦国,方梦祥.二氧化碳强度减排目标下我国产业结构优化的驱动力研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(4):167-173. 被引量:26
  • 9Ericson R,Pakes A. Markov Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work [ J ]. Review of Economic Studies,1995,62 (1) : 53 -82.
  • 10李景华.中国产业结构转移的Markov链[J].数学的实践与认识,2001,31(2):156-161. 被引量:6

二级参考文献61

共引文献134

同被引文献450

引证文献35

二级引证文献471

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部