期刊文献+

高管薪酬与公司绩效:国有与非国有上市公司的实证比较研究 被引量:196

Executive Compensation Affects Firm Performance:The Empirical Comparative Study on State-owned and Non-State-owned Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高管薪酬与公司绩效一直都是学术界和实务界关注的热点。本文选取2003-2010年沪深两市296家国有和176家非国有A股上市公司为样本,在控制了高管持股比例、公司规模、股权集中度和两职兼任等因素之后,实证分析了不同所有权结构的公司高管薪酬对公司绩效影响的差异。研究结果表明,高管薪酬水平与公司绩效显著正相关,且随着高管持股数量的增加,非国有上市公司高管薪酬对公司绩效的影响程度更高,但国有上市公司则相反;公司规模的扩大会降低高管薪酬对公司绩效的影响,且只有当国有上市公司和非国有企业的股权集中度在不同的区间范围内,高管薪酬与公司绩效才表现出显著正相关。 Executive compensation and company performance have always been the hot spots of the academic circles and busi- ness world. This research~ samples select from 463 State -owned A-share listed companies and 176 non - State -owned A - share listed companies in Shanghai or Shenzhen Stock Exchange. We take executives holding ratio, company size, ownership concentration and CEO duality as control variables in order that we can analyze the difference of the company ownership structure different effect to the relationship of executives pay and company performance. This study arrive at the following conclusions by analyzing the significant relationship between executives pay level and company performance. Additionally, when the holding numbers increase, the effect of non -State -owned listed companies'executives compensation on company performance will increase. But State -owned listed company is contrast to that. The expanding of company size will reduce the incentive effect on performance. In addition, only when the z index of state - owned and non - state - owned listed compa- ny are in a specific range, can we observe the positive significant relationship between executive pay and company perform-
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期90-101,共12页 China Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71103061) 教育部博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20110161120030) 湖南省社会科学重点基金项目(12ZDB32) 湖南省自然科学青年人才培养联合基金项目(11JJB004) 湖南省软科学基金项目(2012ZK3037)
关键词 高管薪酬 公司绩效 国有上市公司 非国有上市公司 executive pay performance state -owned listed company non- State -owned listed companies
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Jensen MC, Murphy KJ. Performance Pay and Top - man- agement Incentives [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(2) :225 -264.
  • 2Steven NKaplan. Top Executive Rewards and Firm Per- formance : A Comparison of Japan and the U. S [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1994, 102(3):510-546.
  • 3Hall J Hall, Jeffrey B Liebman. Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats? [ J ]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 8, (13) :653 - 691.
  • 4K J Sigler. CEO Compensation and Company Performance[J]. Business and Economics Journal,2011 (31) :1 -8.
  • 5魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,35(3):32-39. 被引量:1647
  • 6冯根福,赵珏航.管理者薪酬、在职消费与公司绩效——基于合作博弈的分析视角[J].中国工业经济,2012(6):147-158. 被引量:147
  • 7Jensen M C, W H Meckling. Theory of the Firm : Manage- rial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [ J ] . Journal of Financial Economics, 1976 (3) : 305 - 360.
  • 8Jensen M C, Murphy KJ. CEO Incentives- it's Not How Much You Pay, But How [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 1990,68(3) :138 - 153.
  • 9Mehran H. Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance [ J ] . Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 38(2) :163 - 184.
  • 10Conyon M. J. Corporate Governance and Executive Com- pensation [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1997, 15(4) :493 -509.

二级参考文献71

引证文献196

二级引证文献1043

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部