期刊文献+

城镇污水处理厂污泥处理处置工艺生命周期评价 被引量:11

Life Cycle Assessment of Sewage Sludge Treatment or Disposal Technologies
原文传递
导出
摘要 以实际工程为例对目前国内主流的三种污泥处理处置工艺(好氧发酵、填埋、焚烧)进行了基于生命周期的系统评价,分别从致癌风险、温室效应、土地占用和能耗四个方面,横向比较了三种工艺的环境负荷。结果显示,好氧发酵工艺在致癌风险、温室效应和能耗方面均表现出较低负荷值,而焚烧则在运行能耗、致癌风险上负荷较高,填埋的主要问题集中在土地占用和温室效应两方面。 Three typical sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies including aerobic com- post, landfill and incineration were assessed based on life cycle. Environmental loads (Pt) of the three technologies were calculated and compared in terms of carcinogenic risk, greenhouse effect, land occu- pancy rate and energy consumption. The results indicated that aerobic compost had a lower Pt amount in carcinogenic risk, greenhouse effect and energy consumption than landfill and incineration. However, in- cineration had a disadvantage in carcinogenic risk and energy consumption. Similarly, the main problems of landfill focused on land occupancy rate and greenhouse effect.
出处 《中国给水排水》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期11-13,共3页 China Water & Wastewater
基金 公益性行业(环保)科研专项(201109035-01) 北京市科技新星计划(Z121109002512061) 国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAB18B03) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41201585)
关键词 污泥处理处置 好氧发酵 焚烧 填埋 生命周期评价 sludge treatment and disposal aerobic compost incineration landfill lifecycle assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1王静,卢宗文,田顺,陶俊杰.国内外污泥研究现状及进展[J].市政技术,2006,24(3):140-142. 被引量:54
  • 2Wzoreka Z, Jodkoa M, Gorazdaa K, et al. 2006. Extraction of phosphorus compounds from ashes from thermal processing of sewage sludge [ J ]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19:39-50.
  • 3Chin S, Jurng J, Lee J, et al. 2008. Oxygen-enriched air for coincineration of organic sludges with municipal solid waste: A pilot plant experiment[ J]. Waste Management, 28 (12) :2684-2689.
  • 4Font R, Fullana A, Conesa J. 2005. Kinetic models for the pyrolysis and combustion of two types of sewage sludge [ J ]. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 74(1-2) :429- 438.
  • 5Gudrun O, Erwin B, Peter M, et al. 2007. Landfill modelling in LCA-A contribution based on empirical data [J]. Waste Management, 27 (4) :558-574.
  • 6Hong J L, Hong J M, Otaki M, et al. 2009. Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan[J]. Waste Management, (29) :696-703.
  • 7Jan N, Michal K. 2003. Co-combustion of sludge with coal[ J]. Applied Energy, 75 ( 3-4 ) :239-248.
  • 8Lee D H, Yan R, Shao J G, et al. 2008. Combustion characteristics of sewage sludge in a bench-scale fluidized bed reactor[ J]. Energy & Fuels, 22(1) :2-8.
  • 9Lundin M, Olofsson M, Pettersson G J, et al. 2004. Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options [ J ]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41:255-278.
  • 10Philippek C, Werther J. 1997. Co-combustion of wet sewage sludge in a coal-fired circulating fluidised-bed combustor [ J]. Journal of the Institute of Energy, 70 : 141-150.

共引文献101

同被引文献131

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部