对社会热点案件中部分评论的分析

Analysis of some Comments on Social Hot Cases

不同的知识名人对相同的案件做出的评论总是千差万别的。活跃于媒体及网络并且经常就社会热点案件做出评论的知识名人大致可以专业背景为基准简单划分为法律专业的知识名人与非法律专业的知识名人。这两类知识名人在对社会热点案件进行点评时都存在着被大众误解和误导大众的现象。知识名人对社会热点案件的非理性评论一旦与网络民粹主义相结合,将会对社会舆论产生极为负面的影响。文章阐述了如何保障知识名人无后顾之忧地对社会热点案件进行评论,从而更好地普及常识、传播知识、引导舆论、启迪智慧。

Different intellectual elites make different comments on the same case. Those intellectual elites who remain active in media and network and often make comments on hot cases can be simply divided into intellectual elites with legal professional backgrounds and ones with non-legal professional backgrounds. Reviewing the social hot cases, these two kinds of intellectual elites are often misunderstood by public or mislead the public. Once intellectual elites＇ irrational comments on social hot cases combine with the network populism, it will exert negative impact on public opinion. Public authorities should fully protect the spirit of freedom of expression in the Constitution so that intellectual elites can comment on social hot cases without worries, in order to better popularize common sense, spread knowledge, ~uide public opinion and enlighten wisdom.