期刊文献+

下颌低位水平阻生第三磨牙拔除方式的探讨 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨下颌低位水平阻生第三磨牙的最佳拔除方法。方法:将下颌低位水平阻生第三磨牙病例235例随机分为三组,分别采用舌向脱位法、劈牙法、涡轮钻磨牙去骨法拔除患牙,统计平均拔牙时间和拔牙后并发症。结果:舌向脱位法手术时间最短,但舌侧骨板厚的低位水平阻生病例易并发出血和感染;劈牙法手术时间最长,术后易并发肿胀、疼痛、出血和张口受限;涡轮钻磨牙去骨法手术时间可控,术后并发症少且轻。结论:对于舌侧骨板薄的低位水平阻生第三磨牙病例,用舌向脱位法,简单、创伤小;对于舌侧骨板厚的病例,用涡轮牙钻磨牙去骨法,并发症少。
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2013年第3期167-168,共2页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Moss CE, Wake MJ. Lingual access for third surgery: a 20-year ret- rospective audit [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999,37 (4) : 255- 258.
  • 2Ohman A, Kivijarvi K, Blomback U, et al. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography [J]. Den- tomaxillofac Radiol 2006, 35 (1) : 30-35.
  • 3徐光宙,俞创奇,杨驰.阻生下颌第三磨牙的治疗及并发症研究进展[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2010,20(4):289-292. 被引量:39
  • 4Rood JP. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Comparison of two methods of bone removal [J]. Br Dent J, 1992, 172 (3) : 108- 110.
  • 5刘春林,孙晓川,李善红,杨璐蔚,张晓英.358例下颌阻生智齿拔除方法对比[J].黑龙江医学,2007,31(5):400-400. 被引量:6

二级参考文献32

  • 1周建国,步中琦,朱亚芳.下颌第三磨牙阻生两种拔除术的并发症比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):250-252. 被引量:16
  • 2Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, et al. Plateletrich plasma and bovine porous bone mineral combined with guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2002, 37(4):300-306.
  • 3Sammartino G, Tia M, Marenzi G, et al. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma(PRP) in periodontal defect treatment after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 2005,63(6):766-770.
  • 4Subhashraj K. A study on the impact of mandibular third molars on angle fractures[J]. J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 2009, 67(5):968-972.
  • 5Inaoka SD, Carneiro SC, Vasconcelos BC, et al. Reationship between mandibular fracture and impacted lower third molar[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2009, 14(7):E349- E354.
  • 6Monaco G, Daprile G, Tavernese L, et al. Mandibular third molar removal in young patients: an evaluation of 2 different flap designs[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg ,2009,67( 1 ):15-21.
  • 7Moss CE, Wake MJ. Lingual access for third surgery: a 20- year retrospective audit[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999, 37(4):255-258.
  • 8Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1980, 101(2):240-245.
  • 9Rood JP. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Comparison of two methods of bone removal [J]. Br Dent J, 1992, 172(3):108-110.
  • 10Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shehon DW, et al. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1986, 44(11):855-859.

共引文献42

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部